» Articles » PMID: 20843952

Impact of Abdominal Visceral and Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue on Cardiometabolic Risk Factors: the Jackson Heart Study

Overview
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2010 Sep 17
PMID 20843952
Citations 245
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Obesity is a major driver of cardiometabolic risk. Abdominal visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and sc adipose tissue (SAT) may confer differential metabolic risk profiles. We investigated the relations of VAT and SAT with cardiometabolic risk factors in the Jackson Heart Study cohort.

Methods: Participants from the Jackson Heart Study (n=2477; 64% women; mean age, 58 yr) underwent multidetector computed tomography, and the volumetric amounts of VAT and SAT were assessed between 2007 and 2009. Cardiometabolic risk factors were examined by sex in relation to VAT and SAT.

Results: Men had a higher mean volume of VAT (873 vs. 793 cm3) and a lower mean volume of SAT (1730 vs. 2659 cm3) than women (P=0.0001). Per 1-sd increment in either VAT or SAT, we observed elevated levels of fasting plasma glucose and triglyceride, lower levels of high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, and increased odds ratios for hypertension, diabetes, and metabolic syndrome. The effect size of VAT in women was larger than that of SAT [fasting plasma glucose, 5.51±1.0 vs. 3.36±0.9; triglyceride, 0.17±0.01 vs. 0.05±0.01; high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, -5.36±0.4 vs. -2.85±0.4; and odds ratio for hypertension, 1.62 (1.4-1.9) vs. 1.40 (1.2-1.6); diabetes, 1.82 (1.6-2.1) vs. 1.58 (1.4-1.8); and metabolic syndrome, 3.34 (2.8-4.0) vs. 2.06 (1.8-2.4), respectively; P<0.0001 for difference between VAT and SAT]. Similar patterns were also observed in men. Furthermore, VAT remained associated with most risk factors even after accounting for body mass index (P ranging from 0.006-0.0001). The relationship of VAT to most risk factors was significantly different between women and men.

Conclusions: Abdominal VAT and SAT are both associated with adverse cardiometabolic risk factors, but VAT remains more strongly associated with these risk factors. The results from this study suggest that relations with cardiometabolic risk factors are consistent with a pathogenic role of abdominal adiposity in participants of African ancestry.

Citing Articles

Can Exercise-Mediated Adipose Browning Provide an Alternative Explanation for the Obesity Paradox?.

Zhao J, Li X, Liang C, Yan Y Int J Mol Sci. 2025; 26(5).

PMID: 40076419 PMC: 11898606. DOI: 10.3390/ijms26051790.


Association of novel metabolic status with asymptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis: A cross-sectional study.

Guo L, Pan Y, Yang Y, Kong X, Song S, Li M Int J Obes (Lond). 2025; .

PMID: 39856246 DOI: 10.1038/s41366-025-01723-7.


Regional adipose distribution and metabolically unhealthy phenotype in Chinese adults: evidence from China National Health Survey.

Lin B, Hu Y, He H, Chen X, Ou Q, Liu Y Environ Health Prev Med. 2025; 30():5.

PMID: 39828368 PMC: 11744028. DOI: 10.1265/ehpm.24-00154.


Relationships between the Planetary Health Diet Index, its food groups, and polygenic risk of obesity in the CARTaGENE cohort.

Masip G, Nielsen D Nutr Metab (Lond). 2024; 21(1):116.

PMID: 39741271 PMC: 11689624. DOI: 10.1186/s12986-024-00890-0.


Fidelity of BMI, Waist, and Waist-to-Height Ratio as Adiposity Measures in Normoglycemic Black vs White American Adults.

Liu Z, Asuzu P, Patel A, Wan J, Dagogo-Jack S J Endocr Soc. 2024; 9(1):bvae202.

PMID: 39610379 PMC: 11604086. DOI: 10.1210/jendso/bvae202.


References
1.
Fuqua S, Wyatt S, Andrew M, Sarpong D, Henderson F, Cunningham M . Recruiting African-American research participation in the Jackson Heart Study: methods, response rates, and sample description. Ethn Dis. 2005; 15(4 Suppl 6):S6-18-29. View

2.
Brochu M, Starling R, Tchernof A, Matthews D, Poehlman E . Visceral adipose tissue is an independent correlate of glucose disposal in older obese postmenopausal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000; 85(7):2378-84. DOI: 10.1210/jcem.85.7.6685. View

3.
Ferrara C, Goldberg A, Nicklas B, Sorkin J, Ryan A . Sex differences in insulin action and body fat distribution in overweight and obese middle-aged and older men and women. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2008; 33(4):784-90. PMC: 2920284. DOI: 10.1139/H08-062. View

4.
Syme C, Abrahamowicz M, Leonard G, Perron M, Pitiot A, Qiu X . Intra-abdominal adiposity and individual components of the metabolic syndrome in adolescence: sex differences and underlying mechanisms. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2008; 162(5):453-61. DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.162.5.453. View

5.
. Differences in prevalence of obesity among black, white, and Hispanic adults - United States, 2006-2008. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2009; 58(27):740-4. View