» Articles » PMID: 20841637

Changes in Biphasic Electrode Impedance with Protein Adsorption and Cell Growth

Overview
Journal J Neural Eng
Date 2010 Sep 16
PMID 20841637
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study was undertaken to assess the contribution of protein adsorption and cell growth to increases in electrode impedance that occur immediately following implantation of cochlear implant electrodes and other neural stimulation devices. An in vitro model of the electrode-tissue interface was used. Radiolabelled albumin in phosphate buffered saline was added to planar gold electrodes and electrode impedance measured using a charge-balanced biphasic current pulse. The polarization impedance component increased with protein adsorption, while no change to access resistance was observed. The maximum level of protein adsorbed was measured at 0.5 µg cm(-2), indicating a tightly packed monolayer of albumin molecules on the gold electrode and resin substrate. Three cell types were grown over the electrodes, macrophage cell line J774, dissociated fibroblasts and epithelial cell line MDCK, all of which created a significant increase in electrode impedance. As cell cover over electrodes increased, there was a corresponding increase in the initial rise in voltage, suggesting that cell cover mainly contributes to the access resistance of the electrodes. Only a small increase in the polarization component of impedance was seen with cell cover.

Citing Articles

Tissue-Engineered Cochlear Fibrosis Model Links Complex Impedance to Fibrosis Formation for Cochlear Implant Patients.

de Rijk S, Boys A, Roberts I, Jiang C, Garcia C, Owens R Adv Healthc Mater. 2023; 12(24):e2300732.

PMID: 37310792 PMC: 11468547. DOI: 10.1002/adhm.202300732.


Components of impedance in a cochlear implant animal model with TGFβ1-accelerated fibrosis.

Buswinka C, Colesa D, Swiderski D, Raphael Y, Pfingst B Hear Res. 2022; 426:108638.

PMID: 36368194 PMC: 10794021. DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2022.108638.


Cochlear Implantation in Obliterated Cochlea: A Retrospective Analysis and Comparison between the IES Stiff Custom-Made Device and the Split-Array and Regular Electrodes.

Hoffmann J, Warnecke A, Timm M, Kludt E, Prenzler N, Gartner L J Clin Med. 2022; 11(20).

PMID: 36294411 PMC: 9605638. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11206090.


Electrochemical and biological performance of hierarchical platinum-iridium electrodes structured by a femtosecond laser.

Li L, Jiang C, Duan W, Wang Z, Zhang F, He C Microsyst Nanoeng. 2022; 8:96.

PMID: 36065436 PMC: 9440118. DOI: 10.1038/s41378-022-00433-8.


Methods for measuring pre-, intra-, and postoperative skin thickness for cochlear implants.

Zaubitzer L, Schaefer E, Wallhaeuser-Franke E, Burkart J, Herrmann K, Walter B J Otol. 2022; 17(2):72-77.

PMID: 35949548 PMC: 9349019. DOI: 10.1016/j.joto.2021.12.001.


References
1.
Janshoff A, Wegener J, Sieber M, Galla H . Double-mode impedance analysis of epithelial cell monolayers cultured on shear wave resonators. Eur Biophys J. 1996; 25(2):93-103. DOI: 10.1007/s002490050021. View

2.
Hirshorn M, Holley L, Money D, Spector M, Young F, Hales J . Histological evaluation of porous titanium cardiac pacemaker electrode tips. J Biomed Mater Res. 1984; 18(1):47-60. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.820180107. View

3.
Tykocinski M, Duan Y, Tabor B, Cowan R . Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve using high surface area (HiQ) platinum electrodes. Hear Res. 2001; 159(1-2):53-68. DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(01)00320-3. View

4.
Grill W, Mortimer J . Electrical properties of implant encapsulation tissue. Ann Biomed Eng. 1994; 22(1):23-33. DOI: 10.1007/BF02368219. View

5.
Freiesleben De Blasio B, Laane M, Walmann T, Giaever I . Combining optical and electrical impedance techniques for quantitative measurement of confluence in MDCK-I cell cultures. Biotechniques. 2004; 36(4):650-4, 656, 658 passim. DOI: 10.2144/04364RR01. View