Who's Doing the Math? Are We Really Compensating Research Participants?
Overview
Affiliations
Although compensation for expenses to participants in research projects is considered important and the primary reason for paying, there is no evidence to support that investigators and IRB members actually calculate participant cost. Payment recommendations for six hypothetical studies were obtained from a national survey of IRB chairpersons (N = 353) and investigators (N = 495). Survey respondents also recommended payment for specific study procedures. We calculated participant cost for the six hypothetical cases both by procedures and by time involvement. A large percentage recommended only token payments for survey, registry, and medical record review studies. Most chose payment for pharmaceutical studies but the recommended payment did not compensate for calculated costs. Results suggest that compensation and reimbursement as the primary reasons for paying research participants may not match actual practice.
Garland A, Weinfurt K, Sugarman J Clin Trials. 2021; 18(6):699-705.
PMID: 34766524 PMC: 8597901. DOI: 10.1177/17407745211048178.
A Malawi guideline for research study participant remuneration.
Gordon S, Chinula L, Chilima B, Mwapasa V, Dadabhai S, Mlombe Y Wellcome Open Res. 2019; 3:141.
PMID: 30662959 PMC: 6329041. DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.14668.2.
Commonly performed procedures in clinical research: a benchmark for payment.
Dominguez D, Jawara M, Martino N, Sinaii N, Grady C Contemp Clin Trials. 2012; 33(5):860-8.
PMID: 22580210 PMC: 3408804. DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2012.05.001.
Perceptions of reimbursement for clinical trial participation.
Breitkopf C, Loza M, Vincent K, Moench T, Stanberry L, Rosenthal S J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2011; 6(3):31-8.
PMID: 21931235 PMC: 3278858. DOI: 10.1525/jer.2011.6.3.31.
Therapeutic success stifles medical progress.
Ledford H Nature. 2011; 473(7348):433.
PMID: 21614051 DOI: 10.1038/473433a.