» Articles » PMID: 20830577

[Unrepaired Fracture of the Styloid Process of the Ulna: Not a Bad Treatment Result at Distal Radius Fracture]

Overview
Journal Unfallchirurg
Date 2010 Sep 11
PMID 20830577
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: There are well-defined criteria for the treatment of distal radius fractures but the impact of an unrepaired fracture of the styloid process of the ulnar on recovery after operative treatment is uncertain. This study evaluated radiological and functional results after different operative treatment procedures of distal radius fractures in patients with an untreated fracture of the styloid process of the ulna and those without such a fracture.

Methods: Out of 480 patients with operatively treated distal radius fractures 238 were examined at least 1 year after injury. The fracture of the styloid process of the ulna was not repaired. Three groups (patients without a fracture of the styloid process of the ulna, patients with a tip fracture and those with a basal fracture) were evaluated by multivariate analysis (MANOVA) in order to detect influences of the fracture of the styloid process of the ulna on the radiological and functional results.

Results: Neither the existence nor the location of the fracture of the styloid process of the ulna had a significant effect on the radiological and functional results (p(function)=0,849, p(radiology)=0,330, p(scores)=0,426, MANOVA).

Conclusions: The repair of a fracture of the styloid process of the ulna is not necessary if reduction and fixation of the distal radius fracture is anatomical and stable.

Citing Articles

Comparison of Nanocrystalline Hydroxyapatite Bone Graft with Empty Defects in Long Bone Fractures: A Retrospective Case-Control Study.

Pawelke J, Vinayahalingam V, Heiss C, Budak M, Khassawna T, Knapp G Med Sci Monit. 2023; 29:e941112.

PMID: 37872747 PMC: 10612429. DOI: 10.12659/MSM.941112.


Radiographic Healing and Functional Outcomes of Untreated Ulnar Styloid Fractures Following Volar Plate Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures: A Prospective Analysis.

Okoli M, Silverman M, Abboudi J, Jones C, Kirkpatrick W, Liss F Hand (N Y). 2019; 16(3):332-337.

PMID: 31286791 PMC: 8120582. DOI: 10.1177/1558944719855445.


Functional outcomes of distal radius fractures with and without ulnar styloid fractures: a meta-analysis.

Mulders M, Fuhri Snethlage L, de Muinck Keizer R, Goslings J, Schep N J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2017; 43(2):150-157.

PMID: 28931338 PMC: 5791517. DOI: 10.1177/1753193417730323.


Four-Corner Concept: CT-Based Assessment of Fracture Patterns in Distal Radius.

Brink P, Rikli D J Wrist Surg. 2016; 5(2):147-51.

PMID: 27104082 PMC: 4838463. DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1570462.


Union of the ulnar styloid fracture as a function of fracture morphology on conventional radiographs.

Meyer H, Kramer S, OLoughlin P, Vaske B, Krettek C, Gaulke R Skeletal Radiol. 2013; 42(8):1135-41.

PMID: 23695805 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-013-1642-3.

References
1.
Germann G, Wind G, Harth A . [The DASH(Disability of Arm-Shoulder-Hand) Questionnaire--a new instrument for evaluating upper extremity treatment outcome]. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 1999; 31(3):149-52. DOI: 10.1055/s-1999-13902. View

2.
Lindau T, Arner M, Hagberg L . Intraarticular lesions in distal fractures of the radius in young adults. A descriptive arthroscopic study in 50 patients. J Hand Surg Br. 1998; 22(5):638-43. DOI: 10.1016/s0266-7681(97)80364-6. View

3.
Westphal T, Piatek S, Schubert S, Winckler S . Outcome after surgery of distal radius fractures: no differences between external fixation and ORIF. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2005; 125(8):507-14. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-005-0023-3. View

4.
Tsukazaki T, Iwasaki K . Ulnar wrist pain after Colles' fracture. 109 fractures followed for 4 years. Acta Orthop Scand. 1993; 64(4):462-4. DOI: 10.3109/17453679308993668. View

5.
Lindau T, Hagberg L, Adlercreutz C, Jonsson K, Aspenberg P . Distal radioulnar instability is an independent worsening factor in distal radial fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000; (376):229-35. DOI: 10.1097/00003086-200007000-00031. View