» Articles » PMID: 2081707

Ultrastructure of the Periosteum from Membrane Bone

Overview
Journal J Anat
Date 1990 Aug 1
PMID 2081707
Citations 51
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Specimens of skull and palate were taken from 7 beagle dogs after perfusion and the periosteum examined by light and electron microscopy. Three zones were evident in the periosteum, differing in terms of the proportion of cells, fibres and matrix. Zone I consisted of osteoblasts adjacent to the bone surface and a supraosteoblast layer of smaller, compact cells, Zone II was a relatively translucent zone with numerous capillaries and Zone III consisted of cells intermingled with collagen fibrils. Quantification of the relative volumes of tissue components using stereology indicated significant differences between the three zones in each bony site, but not between the two sites. Measurement of numerical density, surface density, profile cross-sectional area, cell volume and cell surface/volume ratio of fibroblast-like cells revealed marked differences between these cells in Zone I and the other two zones; it is possible that the fibroblast-like cells seen in Zone I represent osteoprogenitor cells. Zone II represents the classical cambial layer and contains the majority of the vascular elements present in the periosteum. Zone III contains large volumes of fibroblasts and collagen fibrils and corresponds to the classical fibrous layer. The similarity of this zonal organisation in different regions suggests that periosteum has a consistent structure in membrane bone.

Citing Articles

Healing of periosteal pedicle graft in the treatment of gingival recession defects: A histological study in rabbits.

Singh A, Mahajan A, Rayast D Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2024; 15(2):283-287.

PMID: 39234136 PMC: 11371282. DOI: 10.4103/njms.njms_187_22.


Collagen molecular organization preservation in human fascia lata and periosteum after tissue engineering.

Vettese J, Manon J, Chretien A, Evrard R, Fieve L, Schubert T Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024; 12:1275709.

PMID: 38633664 PMC: 11021576. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1275709.


Periostitis Ossificans: Largest Case Series with Review of Literature.

Saad A, Iyengar K, Kurisunkal V, Nischal N, Davies A, Botchu R Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2023; 34(1):32-36.

PMID: 38106865 PMC: 10723957. DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1770723.


Identifying Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 3 as a Mediator of Periosteal Osteochondral Differentiation through the Construction of microRNA-Based Interaction Networks.

Wells L, Roberts H, Luyten F, Roberts S Biology (Basel). 2023; 12(11).

PMID: 37997980 PMC: 10669632. DOI: 10.3390/biology12111381.


Parathyroid hormone stimulates bone regeneration in an atrophic non-union model in aged mice.

Menger M, Tobias A, Bauer D, Bleimehl M, Scheuer C, Menger M J Transl Med. 2023; 21(1):844.

PMID: 37996876 PMC: 10668449. DOI: 10.1186/s12967-023-04661-y.


References
1.
Skoog T . The use of periosteal flaps in the repair of clefts of the primary palate. Cleft Palate J. 1965; 2:332-9. View

2.
Tonna E . Response of the cellular phase of the skeleton to trauma. Periodontics. 1966; 4(3):105-14. View

3.
Ritsila V, Alhopuro S, GYLLING U, Rintala A . The use of free periosteum for bone formation in congenital clefts of the maxilla. A preliminary report. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1972; 6(1):57-60. DOI: 10.3109/02844317209103460. View

4.
Schroeder H . Correlated morphometric and biochemical analysis of gingival tissue. Morphometric model, tissue sampling and test of stereologic procedures. J Microsc. 1973; 99(3):301-29. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1973.tb04629.x. View

5.
Holtrop M . The ultrastructure of bone. Ann Clin Lab Sci. 1975; 5(4):264-71. View