» Articles » PMID: 20814692

Similarity and Match Rates of the Human Dentition in Three Dimensions: Relevance to Bitemark Analysis

Overview
Journal Int J Legal Med
Specialty Forensic Sciences
Date 2010 Sep 4
PMID 20814692
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Uniqueness of the human dentition is a fundamental premise in bitemark analysis. Despite the importance of this key aspect of bitemark methodology, systematic studies of large populations have been limited. Furthermore, there have been no investigations of the significance of the third dimension with regard to dental uniqueness. One hundred digitally scanned mandibular models were analyzed in both 2D and three dimension (3D) using Landmark software. Additionally, 500 3D maxillary and mandibular sets were investigated for determining dental match rate. Statistical analysis was performed with geometric morphometric methods. Results show that measurements in 3D preserve more information about the dentition, reducing but not eliminating random matches in a sample population of 100 mandibular dentitions. Examination of pairs of maxillary and mandibular dentitions showed a substantial number of random matches (197 maxillary, 51 mandibular, one of both maxillary and mandibular). Conclusions indicate that a zero match rate cannot be claimed for the population studied.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of Bitemark Analysis's Potential Application in Forensic Identification: A Systematic Review.

Christoloukas N, Mitsea A, Rontogianni A, Papadakis E, Angelopoulos C Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(11).

PMID: 38893706 PMC: 11171794. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14111180.


Reverse engineering in forensic investigations: a new approach to bite mark analysis.

Macorano E, Mele F, Calvano M, Leonardelli M, Duma S, De Gabriele G J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2024; 41(3):45-51.

PMID: 38183971 PMC: 10859075.


Three-dimensional validation of the impact of the quantity of teeth or tooth parts on the morphological difference between twin dentitions.

Franco A, Willems G, Couto Souza P, Coucke W, Thevissen P J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2016; 34(1):27-37.

PMID: 27350700 PMC: 5734821.


The uniqueness of the human dentition as forensic evidence: a systematic review on the technological methodology.

Franco A, Willems G, Souza P, Bekkering G, Thevissen P Int J Legal Med. 2014; 129(6):1277-83.

PMID: 25398633 DOI: 10.1007/s00414-014-1109-7.


The examination and identification of bite marks in foods using 3D scanning and 3D comparison methods.

Naether S, Buck U, Campana L, Breitbeck R, Thali M Int J Legal Med. 2011; 126(1):89-95.

PMID: 21607716 DOI: 10.1007/s00414-011-0580-7.

References
1.
Pretty I . The barriers to achieving an evidence base for bitemark analysis. Forensic Sci Int. 2006; 159 Suppl 1:S110-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.02.033. View

2.
Sheets H, Bush P, Brzozowski C, Nawrocki L, Ho P, Bush M . Dental shape match rates in selected and orthodontically treated populations in New York State: a two-dimensional study. J Forensic Sci. 2011; 56(3):621-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2011.01731.x. View

3.
Bush M, Bush P, Sheets H . Statistical evidence for the similarity of the human dentition. J Forensic Sci. 2010; 56(1):118-23. DOI: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01531.x. View

4.
Saks M, Koehler J . The coming paradigm shift in forensic identification science. Science. 2005; 309(5736):892-5. DOI: 10.1126/science.1111565. View

5.
Kieser J, Bernal V, Waddell J, Raju S . The uniqueness of the human anterior dentition: a geometric morphometric analysis. J Forensic Sci. 2007; 52(3):671-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2007.00403.x. View