» Articles » PMID: 20813195

Alignment of the Medial Tibial Plateau Affects the Rate of Joint Space Narrowing in the Osteoarthritic Knee

Overview
Date 2010 Sep 4
PMID 20813195
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To determine, in serial fixed-flexion (FF) radiographs of subjects with knee osteoarthritis (KOA), the importance of, and basis for, the effect of alignment of the medial tibial plateau (MTP), as determined by the inter-margin distance (IMD), on joint space narrowing (JSN).

Methods: Baseline and 12-month X-rays of 590 knees with Kellgren and Lawrence grade (KLG) 2/3 OA from the public-release dataset of the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) were assigned to subgroups based upon IMD at baseline (IMD(BL)) and the difference between IMD(BL) and IMD(12 mos). Relationships of JSN to IMD(BL) and to the difference between IMD(BL and) IMD(12 mos) were evaluated.

Results: In all 590 knees, mean JSN was 0.13 ± 0.51 mm (P<0.0001) and MTP alignment and replication of IMD(BL) in the 12-month film were, in general, poor. JSN was significantly (P=0.012) more rapid in Subgroup A (IMD≤1.70 mm at both time points) than in Subgroup B (both IMDs>1.70 mm): 0.15 ± 0.43; 0.08 ± 0.47. Within Subgroup B we identified a subset, Subgroup B1, in which, although alignment was poor at both time points, the large IMD(BL) was, by chance, highly reproduced by IMD(12 mos) (difference between the two IMDs=0.01 ± 0.27 mm, NS). JSN in Subgroup B1 was 0.06 ± 0.41 mm and did not differ from that in other knees of Subgroup B (P=0.87). The standardized response mean (SRM) in all 590 knees and Subgroups A, B and B1 was 0.25, 0.34, 0.17 and 0.06, respectively. Independent of IMD(BL), JSN correlated significantly with the difference between the IMDs in the two radiographs (r=0.17, P=0.0001).

Conclusion: Skewed MTP alignment in serial films and poor replication of IMD(BL) in the follow-up exam affect JSN measurement. The magnitude of change in joint space width (JSW) related to the poor quality of alignment that is common with the FF view jeopardizes accurate evaluation of JSN.

Citing Articles

Low Rates of Radiographic Knee Osteoarthritis 5 Years After ACL Reconstruction or Rehabilitation Alone: The Delaware-Oslo ACL Cohort Study.

Pedersen M, Grindem H, Berg B, Gunderson R, Engebretsen L, Axe M Orthop J Sports Med. 2021; 9(8):23259671211027530.

PMID: 34423060 PMC: 8375355. DOI: 10.1177/23259671211027530.


The combination of an inflammatory peripheral blood gene expression and imaging biomarkers enhance prediction of radiographic progression in knee osteoarthritis.

Attur M, Krasnokutsky S, Zhou H, Samuels J, Chang G, Bencardino J Arthritis Res Ther. 2020; 22(1):208.

PMID: 32912331 PMC: 7488029. DOI: 10.1186/s13075-020-02298-6.


The posterior-anterior-flexed view is essential for the evaluation of valgus osteoarthritis. A prospective study on 134 valgus knees.

Rueckl K, Runer A, Bechler U, Faschingbauer M, Boelch S, Sculco P BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020; 20(1):636.

PMID: 31888584 PMC: 6937983. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-019-3012-3.


Novel Approach to Estimate Osteoarthritis Progression: Use of the Reliable Change Index in the Evaluation of Joint Space Loss.

Parsons C, Judge A, Leyland K, Bruyere O, Petit Dop F, Chapurlat R Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2018; 71(2):300-307.

PMID: 29741284 PMC: 6129388. DOI: 10.1002/acr.23596.


The posterior-anterior flexed view is better than the anterior-posterior view for assessing osteoarthritis of the knee.

Rueckl K, Boettner F, Maza N, Runer A, Bechler U, Sculco P Skeletal Radiol. 2017; 47(4):511-517.

PMID: 29159676 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-017-2815-2.


References
1.
Peterfy C, Li J, Zaim S, Duryea J, Lynch J, Miaux Y . Comparison of fixed-flexion positioning with fluoroscopic semi-flexed positioning for quantifying radiographic joint-space width in the knee: test-retest reproducibility. Skeletal Radiol. 2003; 32(3):128-32. DOI: 10.1007/s00256-002-0603-z. View

2.
Buckland-Wright J, Macfarlane D, Williams S, Ward R . Accuracy and precision of joint space width measurements in standard and macroradiographs of osteoarthritic knees. Ann Rheum Dis. 1995; 54(11):872-80. PMC: 1010036. DOI: 10.1136/ard.54.11.872. View

3.
Altman R, Hochberg M, Murphy Jr W, Wolfe F, Lequesne M . Atlas of individual radiographic features in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 1995; 3 Suppl A:3-70. View

4.
Mazzuca S, Le Graverand M, Vignon E, Hunter D, Jackson C, Kraus V . Performance of a non-fluoroscopically assisted substitute for the Lyon schuss knee radiograph: quality and reproducibility of positioning and sensitivity to joint space narrowing in osteoarthritic knees. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2008; 16(12):1555-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2008.04.010. View

5.
Botha-Scheepers S, Kloppenburg M, Kroon H, Le Graverand M, Breedveld F, Ravaud P . Fixed-flexion knee radiography: the sensitivity to detect knee joint space narrowing in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2006; 15(3):350-3. DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2006.09.006. View