» Articles » PMID: 20808907

Inter-brain Synchronization During Social Interaction

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2010 Sep 3
PMID 20808907
Citations 277
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

During social interaction, both participants are continuously active, each modifying their own actions in response to the continuously changing actions of the partner. This continuous mutual adaptation results in interactional synchrony to which both members contribute. Freely exchanging the role of imitator and model is a well-framed example of interactional synchrony resulting from a mutual behavioral negotiation. How the participants' brain activity underlies this process is currently a question that hyperscanning recordings allow us to explore. In particular, it remains largely unknown to what extent oscillatory synchronization could emerge between two brains during social interaction. To explore this issue, 18 participants paired as 9 dyads were recorded with dual-video and dual-EEG setups while they were engaged in spontaneous imitation of hand movements. We measured interactional synchrony and the turn-taking between model and imitator. We discovered by the use of nonlinear techniques that states of interactional synchrony correlate with the emergence of an interbrain synchronizing network in the alpha-mu band between the right centroparietal regions. These regions have been suggested to play a pivotal role in social interaction. Here, they acted symmetrically as key functional hubs in the interindividual brainweb. Additionally, neural synchronization became asymmetrical in the higher frequency bands possibly reflecting a top-down modulation of the roles of model and imitator in the ongoing interaction.

Citing Articles

Interpersonal brain synchronization in social pain contexts: an fNIRS-based exploration of empathy.

Lian T, Jiao Z, Juan S, Song J, Zhang P Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2025; 20(1).

PMID: 39856498 PMC: 11878638. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsaf003.


Uniform hyperscanning paradigm to study cooperation and competition.

Nogueira-Islas P, Olguin-Rodriguez P, Tlahuext-Aca H, Muller M MethodsX. 2025; 14():103139.

PMID: 39850760 PMC: 11755012. DOI: 10.1016/j.mex.2024.103139.


How accurately can we estimate spontaneous body kinematics from video recordings? Effect of movement amplitude on OpenPose accuracy.

Koul A, Novembre G Behav Res Methods. 2025; 57(1):38.

PMID: 39747756 PMC: 11695451. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-024-02546-6.


Caregiver-child neural synchrony: Magic, mirage, or developmental mechanism?.

Roche E, Redcay E, Romeo R Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2024; 71():101482.

PMID: 39693894 PMC: 11720112. DOI: 10.1016/j.dcn.2024.101482.


Interbrain neural correlates of self and other integration in joint statistical learning.

Zheng Z, Wang J NPJ Sci Learn. 2024; 9(1):68.

PMID: 39567522 PMC: 11579319. DOI: 10.1038/s41539-024-00280-4.


References
1.
Fries P . A mechanism for cognitive dynamics: neuronal communication through neuronal coherence. Trends Cogn Sci. 2005; 9(10):474-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.08.011. View

2.
Jensen O, Kaiser J, Lachaux J . Human gamma-frequency oscillations associated with attention and memory. Trends Neurosci. 2007; 30(7):317-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.tins.2007.05.001. View

3.
Ikegami T, Iizuka H . Turn-taking interaction as a cooperative and co-creative process. Infant Behav Dev. 2007; 30(2):278-88. DOI: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2007.02.002. View

4.
Babiloni F, Cincotti F, Mattia D, Mattiocco M, Fallani F, Tocci A . Hypermethods for EEG hyperscanning. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2007; 2006:3666-9. DOI: 10.1109/IEMBS.2006.260754. View

5.
Hamzei F, Rijntjes M, Dettmers C, Glauche V, Weiller C, Buchel C . The human action recognition system and its relationship to Broca's area: an fMRI study. Neuroimage. 2003; 19(3):637-44. DOI: 10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00087-9. View