» Articles » PMID: 20805101

Critical Brain Regions for Action Recognition: Lesion Symptom Mapping in Left Hemisphere Stroke

Overview
Journal Brain
Specialty Neurology
Date 2010 Sep 1
PMID 20805101
Citations 119
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A number of conflicting claims have been advanced regarding the role of the left inferior frontal gyrus, inferior parietal lobe and posterior middle temporal gyrus in action recognition, driven in part by an ongoing debate about the capacities of putative mirror systems that match observed and planned actions. We report data from 43 left hemisphere stroke patients in two action recognition tasks in which they heard and saw an action word ('hammering') and selected from two videoclips the one corresponding to the word. In the spatial recognition task, foils contained errors of body posture or movement amplitude/timing. In the semantic recognition task, foils were semantically related (sawing). Participants also performed a comprehension control task requiring matching of the same verbs to objects (hammer). Using regression analyses controlling for both the comprehension control task and lesion volume, we demonstrated that performance in the semantic gesture recognition task was predicted by per cent damage to the posterior temporal lobe, whereas the spatial gesture recognition task was predicted by per cent damage to the inferior parietal lobule. A whole-brain voxel-based lesion symptom-mapping analysis suggested that the semantic and spatial gesture recognition tasks were associated with lesioned voxels in the posterior middle temporal gyrus and inferior parietal lobule, respectively. The posterior middle temporal gyrus appears to serve as a central node in the association of actions and meanings. The inferior parietal lobule, held to be a homologue of the monkey parietal mirror neuron system, is critical for encoding object-related postures and movements, a relatively circumscribed aspect of gesture recognition. The inferior frontal gyrus, on the other hand, was not predictive of performance in any task, suggesting that previous claims regarding its role in action recognition may require refinement.

Citing Articles

Apraxia Rehabilitation Using Gesture Training and Sequencing Tasks: A Case Report.

Eguchi T, Takashiba J, Morioka S Cureus. 2025; 17(1):e77115.

PMID: 39925578 PMC: 11805599. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.77115.


Behaviorally-relevant features of observed actions dominate cortical representational geometry in natural vision.

Han J, Chauhan V, Philip R, Taylor M, Jung H, Halchenko Y Res Sq. 2024; .

PMID: 39678333 PMC: 11643331. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5478816/v1.


Apraxia: From Neuroanatomical Pathways to Clinical Manifestations.

Stoll S, Lorentz L, Binkofski F, Randerath J Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2024; 25(1):1.

PMID: 39549184 PMC: 11569007. DOI: 10.1007/s11910-024-01391-6.


A 7T fMRI investigation of hand and tool areas in the lateral and ventral occipitotemporal cortex.

Pillet I, Cerrahoglu B, Philips R, Dumoulin S, Op de Beeck H PLoS One. 2024; 19(11):e0308565.

PMID: 39499698 PMC: 11537398. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308565.


Thalamic functional dysconnectivity in patients with left-hemisphere chronic capsular and pontine stroke.

Guo J, Zhang H, Liu J, Wang C, Cao C, Cheng J Front Neurosci. 2024; 18:1451307.

PMID: 39474460 PMC: 11519739. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1451307.


References
1.
Heilman K, Rothi L, Valenstein E . Two forms of ideomotor apraxia. Neurology. 1982; 32(4):342-6. DOI: 10.1212/wnl.32.4.342. View

2.
Iacoboni M . Imitation, empathy, and mirror neurons. Annu Rev Psychol. 2008; 60:653-70. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163604. View

3.
Willems R, Ozyurek A, Hagoort P . Differential roles for left inferior frontal and superior temporal cortex in multimodal integration of action and language. Neuroimage. 2009; 47(4):1992-2004. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.05.066. View

4.
Snodgrass J, Vanderwart M . A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. J Exp Psychol Hum Learn. 1980; 6(2):174-215. DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.6.2.174. View

5.
Goldenberg G, Karnath H . The neural basis of imitation is body part specific. J Neurosci. 2006; 26(23):6282-7. PMC: 6675202. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0638-06.2006. View