» Articles » PMID: 20802388

Validity and Reliability of Intraoperative Monitoring in Pediatric Spinal Deformity Surgery: a 23-year Experience of 3436 Surgical Cases

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2010 Aug 31
PMID 20802388
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Study Design: This was a 23-year retrospective study of 3436 consecutive pediatric orthopedic spinal surgery patients between 1995 and 2008.

Objective: To demonstrate the effectiveness of multimodality electrophysiologic monitoring in reducing the incidence of iatrogenic neurologic deficit in a pediatric spinal surgery population.

Summary Of Background Data: The elective nature of many pediatric spinal surgery procedures continues to drive the need for minimizing risk to each individual patient. Electrophysiologic monitoring has been proposed as an effective means of decreasing permanent neurologic injury in this population.

Methods: A total of 3436 consecutive monitored pediatric spinal procedures at a single institution between January 1985 and September 2008 were reviewed. Monitoring included somatosensory-evoked potentials, descending neurogenic-evoked potentials, transcranial electric motor-evoked potentials, and various nerve root monitoring techniques. Patients were divided into 10 diagnostic categories. True-positive and false-negative monitoring outcomes were analyzed for each category. Neurologic deficits were classified as transient or permanent.

Results: Seven of 10 diagnostic groups demonstrated true positive findings resulting in surgical intervention. Seventy-four (2.2%) potential neurologic deficits were identified in 3436 pediatric surgical cases. Seven patients (0.2%) had false-negative monitoring outcomes. These patients awoke with neurologic deficits undetected by neuromonitoring. Intervention reduced permanent neurologic deficits to 6 (0.17%) patients. Monitoring data were able to detect permanent neurologic status in 99.6% of this population. The ratio of intraoperative events to total monitored cases was 1 event every 42 surgical cases and 1 permanent neurologic deficit every 573 cases.

Conclusion: The combined use of somatosensory-evoked potentials, transcranial electric motor-evoked potentials, descending neurogenic-evoked potentials, and electromyography monitoring allowed accurate detection of permanent neurologic status in 99.6% of 3436 patients and reduced the total number of permanent neurologic injuries to 6.

Citing Articles

Sensitivity of intraoperative electrophysiological monitoring for scoliosis correction in identifying postoperative neurological deficits: a retrospective chart review of the Scoliosis Research Society morbidity and mortality database.

Lau K, Kwan K, Cheung J BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025; 26(1):186.

PMID: 39994650 PMC: 11849389. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-08115-4.


Comparison of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring between propofol and remimazolam during total intravenous anesthesia in the cervical spine surgery: a prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial.

Kim M, Park J, Park Y, Cho Y, Kim D, Lee D Korean J Anesthesiol. 2025; 78(1):16-29.

PMID: 39895300 PMC: 11834876. DOI: 10.4097/kja.24613.


Intraoperative somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) monitoring: an updated position statement by the American Society of Neurophysiological Monitoring.

Richard Toleikis J, Pace C, R Jahangiri F, B Hemmer L, C Toleikis S J Clin Monit Comput. 2024; 38(5):1003-1042.

PMID: 39068294 PMC: 11427520. DOI: 10.1007/s10877-024-01201-x.


The adjunct use of descending neurogenic-evoked potentials when transcranial motor-evoked potentials degrade into warning criteria in pediatric spinal deformity surgery: minimizing false-positive events.

Troyer S, Ribaudo J, Raynor B, Zertan C, Kelly B, Kelly M Spine Deform. 2023; 11(6):1427-1433.

PMID: 37535306 DOI: 10.1007/s43390-023-00743-5.


Upper extremity neuromonitoring changes are more common than lower extremity during spinal fusion for Scheuermann's kyphosis.

Ghazi J, Sparagana S, Rampy P, Sucato D, Johnson M Spine Deform. 2023; 11(5):1253-1259.

PMID: 37074516 DOI: 10.1007/s43390-023-00688-9.