» Articles » PMID: 20799039

Choosing the Nephrostomy Size After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

Overview
Journal World J Urol
Specialty Urology
Date 2010 Aug 28
PMID 20799039
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of nephrostomy tube size on perioperative outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithtotmy (PCNL).

Methods: Forty-five well-matched patients with normal renal function were prospectively divided in two nonrandomized groups after uneventful PCNL (to receive either a 22-Fr, group 1 (n = 24 pts), or a 12-Fr nephrostomy tube, group 2 (n = 21 pts)). In all a balloon nephrostomy catheter with detachable funnel (Rüsch Teleflex, Germany) was used. A Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for measuring the pain was administered 8 and 24 h after the procedure. Postoperative analgesics use (Ketoralac Tromethamine 30 mg), pre- and postoperative Hb, renal function and urinary leaks were registered.

Results: Groups were comparable as demographics and stone characteristics. VAS pain score was significantly higher in group 1 (4.25 vs. 3.2, P < 0.001) only 8 h postoperatively. No significant difference was found in the VAS pain score 24 h p.o. Similarly, analgesics use (1.6 vs. 1.1, P = 0.05), sHb (1.42 vs. 1.21, P = 0.055) and hospital stay (3.8 vs. 3.6, P = 0.63) were not significant between the two groups of patients.

Conclusions: A small bore nephrostomy catheter may reduce pain in the immediate postoperative time. It does not affect blood loss and hospital stay so it can safely be used instead of a large size nephrostomy tube, after uneventful percutaneous procedures.

Citing Articles

Impact of drainage catheter material, size, and anti-dislodgement mechanism on percutaneous nephrostomy exchange intervals: a systematic review protocol.

Iyer D, Konstantinidis M, Li H, Bercu Z, Moon J F1000Res. 2024; 12:1417.

PMID: 38434646 PMC: 10905141. DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.135431.1.


Efficacy of Intercostal Nerve Block for Pain Control After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Chen T, Zhu Z, Du J Front Surg. 2021; 8:623605.

PMID: 33585552 PMC: 7876386. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.623605.


Choosing the appropriate size of Amplatz sheath during percutaneous nephrolithotomy-a novel method.

Thirugnanasambandam V, David D, Kone K, Philipraj J, Mossadeq A Turk J Urol. 2018; 44(2):138-141.

PMID: 29511583 PMC: 5832375. DOI: 10.5152/tud.2017.34682.


Highlights of the university of toronto urology update 2014.

Herschorn S Can Urol Assoc J. 2015; 9(1-2Suppl):S3-9.

PMID: 25784963 PMC: 4334013. DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.2670.


The use of the amplatz sheath in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: does amplatz sheath size matter?.

Karakose A, Aydogdu O, Atesci Y Curr Urol. 2014; 7(3):127-31.

PMID: 24917773 PMC: 4024498. DOI: 10.1159/000356264.


References
1.
Crook T, Lockyer C, Keoghane S, Walmsley B . A randomized controlled trial of nephrostomy placement versus tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Urol. 2008; 180(2):612-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.04.020. View

2.
Shah H, Sodha H, Khandkar A, Kharodawala S, Hegde S, Bansal M . A randomized trial evaluating type of nephrostomy drainage after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: small bore v tubeless. J Endourol. 2008; 22(7):1433-9. DOI: 10.1089/end.2007.0350. View

3.
Lojanapiwat B, Soonthornphan S, Wudhikarn S . Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in selected patients. J Endourol. 2001; 15(7):711-3. DOI: 10.1089/08927790152596299. View

4.
Bellman G, DAVIDOFF R, Candela J, Gerspach J, Kurtz S, Stout L . Tubeless percutaneous renal surgery. J Urol. 1997; 157(5):1578-82. View

5.
Marcovich R, Jacobson A, Singh J, Shah D, El-Hakim A, Lee B . No panacea for drainage after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 2005; 18(8):743-7. DOI: 10.1089/end.2004.18.743. View