» Articles » PMID: 20797920

The Influence of Non-nociceptive Factors on Hot-plate Latency in Rats

Overview
Journal J Pain
Specialties Neurology
Psychiatry
Date 2010 Aug 28
PMID 20797920
Citations 50
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Unlabelled: The hot plate is a widely used test to assess nociception. The effect of non-nociceptive factors (weight, sex, activity, habituation, and repeated testing) on hot-plate latency was examined. Comparison of body weight and hot-plate latency revealed a small but significant inverse correlation (light rats had longer latencies). Habituating rats to the test room for 1 hour prior to testing did not decrease hot-plate latency except for female rats tested on days 2 to 4. Hot-plate latency decreased with repeated daily testing, but this was not caused by a decrease in locomotor activity or learning to respond. Activity on the hot plate was consistent across all 4 trials, and prior exposure to a room-temperature plate caused a similar decrease in latency as rats tested repeatedly on the hot plate. Despite this decrease in baseline hot-plate latency, there was no difference in morphine antinociceptive potency. The present study shows that weight, habituation to the test room, and repeated testing can alter baseline hot-plate latency, but these effects are small and have relatively little impact on morphine antinociception.

Perspective: This manuscript shows that non-nociceptive factors such as body weight, habituation, and repeated testing can alter hot-plate latency, but these factors do not alter morphine potency. In sum, the hot-plate test is an easy to use and reliable method to assess supraspinally organized nociceptive responses.

Citing Articles

Analgesic effect of simultaneously targeting multiple pain processing brain circuits in an aged humanized mouse model of chronic pain by transcranial focused ultrasound.

Kim M, Yeh C, Yu K, Li Z, Gupta K, He B APL Bioeng. 2025; 9(1):016108.

PMID: 39990925 PMC: 11846022. DOI: 10.1063/5.0236108.


Establishment and evaluation of a carotid artery dissection model in rats.

Zhang S, Han Z, Cao Y, Wu W, Liu Y, Yang S Front Neurol. 2025; 15:1420278.

PMID: 39744109 PMC: 11688284. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1420278.


Analgesic effect of oxytocin in alcohol-dependent male and female rats.

Marendes J, Muench M, Young C, Ghaly A, Tunstall B Alcohol. 2024; 123:27-38.

PMID: 39716604 PMC: 11875206. DOI: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2024.12.002.


Behavioral and neural correlates of diverse conditioned fear responses in male and female rats.

Mitchell J, Vincelette L, Tuberman S, Sheppard V, Bergeron E, Calitri R Neurobiol Stress. 2024; 33:100675.

PMID: 39391589 PMC: 11465128. DOI: 10.1016/j.ynstr.2024.100675.


Behavioral and neural correlates of diverse conditioned fear responses in male and female rats.

Mitchell J, Vincelette L, Tuberman S, Sheppard V, Bergeron E, Calitri R bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39229164 PMC: 11370446. DOI: 10.1101/2024.08.20.608817.


References
1.
LE Bars D, Gozariu M, Cadden S . Animal models of nociception. Pharmacol Rev. 2001; 53(4):597-652. View

2.
Gebhart G, Mitchell C . Further studies on the development of tolerance to the analgesic effect of morphine: the role played by the cylinder in the hot plate testing procedure. Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther. 1971; 191(1):96-103. View

3.
TABER R . Predictive value of analgesic assays in mice and rats. Adv Biochem Psychopharmacol. 1973; 8(0):191-211. View

4.
Ingram S, Fossum E, Morgan M . Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence for opioid tolerance in adolescent rats. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2006; 32(3):600-6. DOI: 10.1038/sj.npp.1301139. View

5.
OCallaghan J, Holtzman S . Quantification of the analgesic activity of narcotic antagonists by a modified hot-plate procedure. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1975; 192(3):497-505. View