» Articles » PMID: 20797840

Defining the Need for Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy in the General Population: a Criterion-based Benchmarking Approach

Overview
Specialty Oncology
Date 2010 Aug 28
PMID 20797840
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aims: Determining the appropriate rate of radiotherapy is important for ensuring optimal radiotherapy utilisation and accessibility. A criterion-based benchmark (CBB) approach was developed as an alternative to evidence-based methods of determining the need for radiotherapy in prostate cancer. Our primary objective was to determine the initial/lifetime CBB radiotherapy rates in prostate cancer and to compare results with evidence-based estimates. Secondary objectives were to compare observed radiotherapy rates in Ontario, Canada and the USA with the estimated rates.

Materials And Methods: Benchmarks were defined in Ontario as communities in proximity to cancer centres and without long waiting lists. Surgical and radiotherapy data, encompassing both external beam radiation and brachytherapy, for 1997-2001 were collected for Ontario cancer patients. The Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) public use file described treatment in the USA.

Results: In total, 35 379 cases of prostate cancer were diagnosed in Ontario and 93 275 in SEER. CBB estimates of the initial/lifetime need for radiotherapy were 37.2% (95% confidence interval: 35.8-38.7) and 59.1% (54.3-63.9). Our group's evidence-based estimate (Ebest) rates were 32.3% (28.5-36.1) and 61.2% (55.6-66.8). Observed initial radiotherapy rates were 28.0% (27.5-28.4) in Ontario and 37.0% (36.7-37.3) in SEER. In Ontario, the estimated lifetime rate was 42.6% (41.2-44.0).

Conclusions: CBB provides a reasonable estimate of the need for radiotherapy in prostate cancer. Observed initial radiotherapy rates in the USA were concordant with the CBB estimate. The CBB suggests a shortfall in radiotherapy utilisation for prostate cancer in Ontario.

Citing Articles

Estimating the optimal perioperative chemotherapy utilization rate for muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Karim S, Mackillop W, Brennan K, Peng Y, Siemens D, Krzyzanowska M Cancer Med. 2019; 8(14):6258-6271.

PMID: 31472011 PMC: 6797575. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.2449.


Estimating the optimal rate of adjuvant chemotherapy utilization for stage III colon cancer.

Karim S, Booth C, Brennan K, Peng Y, Siemens D, Krzyzanowska M Cancer Med. 2019; 8(12):5590-5599.

PMID: 31407518 PMC: 6745837. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.2456.


A population-based study examining the influence of a specialized rapid-access cancer clinic on initial treatment choice in localized prostate cancer.

Vos L, Ho C, Donnelly B, Reuther J, Kerba M Can Urol Assoc J. 2018; 12(7):E314-E317.

PMID: 29603917 PMC: 6118053. DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.4866.


Assessing guideline impact on referral patterns of post-prostatectomy patients to radiation oncologists.

Taggar A, Alghamdi M, Tilly D, Kostaras X, Kerba M, Husain S Can Urol Assoc J. 2016; 10(9-10):314-318.

PMID: 27800051 PMC: 5085909. DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.3539.


Treatment patterns among Canadian men diagnosed with localized low-risk prostate cancer.

Sandoval C, Tran K, Rahal R, Porter G, Fung S, Louzado C Curr Oncol. 2015; 22(6):427-9.

PMID: 26715876 PMC: 4687664. DOI: 10.3747/co.22.2895.