» Articles » PMID: 20736500

Block Matching 3D Random Noise Filtering for Absorption Optical Projection Tomography

Overview
Journal Phys Med Biol
Publisher IOP Publishing
Date 2010 Aug 26
PMID 20736500
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Absorption and emission optical projection tomography (OPT), alternatively referred to as optical computed tomography (optical-CT) and optical-emission computed tomography (optical-ECT), are recently developed three-dimensional imaging techniques with value for developmental biology and ex vivo gene expression studies. The techniques' principles are similar to the ones used for x-ray computed tomography and are based on the approximation of negligible light scattering in optically cleared samples. The optical clearing is achieved by a chemical procedure which aims at substituting the cellular fluids within the sample with a cell membranes' index matching solution. Once cleared the sample presents very low scattering and is then illuminated with a light collimated beam whose intensity is captured in transillumination mode by a CCD camera. Different projection images of the sample are subsequently obtained over a 360 degrees full rotation, and a standard backprojection algorithm can be used in a similar fashion as for x-ray tomography in order to obtain absorption maps. Because not all biological samples present significant absorption contrast, it is not always possible to obtain projections with a good signal-to-noise ratio, a condition necessary to achieve high-quality tomographic reconstructions. Such is the case for example, for early stage's embryos. In this work we demonstrate how, through the use of a random noise removal algorithm, the image quality of the reconstructions can be considerably improved even when the noise is strongly present in the acquired projections. Specifically, we implemented a block matching 3D (BM3D) filter applying it separately on each acquired transillumination projection before performing a complete three-dimensional tomographical reconstruction. To test the efficiency of the adopted filtering scheme, a phantom and a real biological sample were processed. In both cases, the BM3D filter led to a signal-to-noise ratio increment of over 30 dB on severe noise-affected reconstructions revealing original-noise-hidden-image details. These results show the utility of the BM3D approach for OPT under typical conditions of very low light absorption, suggesting its implementation as an efficient alternative to other filtering schemes such as for example the median filter.

Citing Articles

Self-supervised denoising of grating-based phase-contrast computed tomography.

Wirtensohn S, Schmid C, Berthe D, John D, Heck L, Taphorn K Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):32169.

PMID: 39741166 PMC: 11688505. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-83517-x.


A systematic review of deep learning-based denoising for low-dose computed tomography from a perceptual quality perspective.

Kim W, Jeon S, Byun G, Yoo H, Choi J Biomed Eng Lett. 2024; 14(6):1153-1173.

PMID: 39465112 PMC: 11502640. DOI: 10.1007/s13534-024-00419-7.


Reconstructing and analyzing the invariances of low-dose CT image denoising networks.

Eulig E, Jager F, Maier J, Ommer B, Kachelriess M Med Phys. 2024; 52(1):188-200.

PMID: 39348044 PMC: 11700010. DOI: 10.1002/mp.17413.


Benchmarking deep learning-based low-dose CT image denoising algorithms.

Eulig E, Ommer B, Kachelriess M Med Phys. 2024; 51(12):8776-8788.

PMID: 39287517 PMC: 11656299. DOI: 10.1002/mp.17379.


Self-adaption and texture generation: A hybrid loss function for low-dose CT denoising.

Wang Z, Liu M, Cheng X, Zhu J, Wang X, Gong H J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2023; 24(9):e14113.

PMID: 37571834 PMC: 10476999. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14113.


References
1.
McGurk L, Morrison H, Keegan L, Sharpe J, OConnell M . Three-dimensional imaging of Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS One. 2007; 2(9):e834. PMC: 1952176. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000834. View

2.
Oldham M, Sakhalkar H, Wang Y, Guo P, Oliver T, Bentley R . Three-dimensional imaging of whole rodent organs using optical computed and emission tomography. J Biomed Opt. 2007; 12(1):014009. DOI: 10.1117/1.2709858. View

3.
Sharpe J . Optical projection tomography as a new tool for studying embryo anatomy. J Anat. 2003; 202(2):175-81. PMC: 1571078. DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-7580.2003.00155.x. View

4.
Sharpe J, Ahlgren U, Perry P, Hill B, Ross A, Hecksher-Sorensen J . Optical projection tomography as a tool for 3D microscopy and gene expression studies. Science. 2002; 296(5567):541-5. DOI: 10.1126/science.1068206. View

5.
Huang D, Swanson E, Lin C, Schuman J, Stinson W, Chang W . Optical coherence tomography. Science. 1991; 254(5035):1178-81. PMC: 4638169. DOI: 10.1126/science.1957169. View