» Articles » PMID: 20726728

Increasing Damage to Tumor Blood Vessels During Motexafin Lutetium-PDT Through Use of Low Fluence Rate

Overview
Journal Radiat Res
Specialties Genetics
Radiology
Date 2010 Aug 24
PMID 20726728
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) with low light fluence rate has rarely been studied in protocols that use short drug-light intervals and thus deliver illumination while plasma concentrations of photosensitizer are high, creating a prominent vascular response. In this study, the effects of light fluence rate on PDT response were investigated using motexafin lutetium (10 mg/kg) in combination with 730 nm light and a 180-min drug-light interval. At 180 min, the plasma level of photosensitizer was 5.7 ng/microl compared to 3.1 ng/mg in RIF tumor, and PDT-mediated vascular effects were confirmed by a spasmodic decrease in blood flow during illumination. Light delivery at 25 mW/cm(2) significantly improved long-term tumor responses over that at 75 mW/cm(2). This effect could not be attributed to oxygen conservation at low fluence rate, because 25 mW/cm(2) PDT provided little benefit to tumor hemoglobin oxygen saturation. However, 25 mW/cm(2) PDT did prolong the duration of ischemic insult during illumination and was correspondingly associated with greater decreases in perfusion immediately after PDT, followed by smaller increases in total hemoglobin concentration in the hours after PDT. Increases in blood volume suggest blood pooling from suboptimal vascular damage; thus the smaller increases after 25 mW/cm(2) PDT provide evidence of more widespread vascular damage, which was accompanied by greater decreases in clonogenic survival. Further study of low fluence rate as a means to improve responses to PDT under conditions designed to predominantly damage vasculature is warranted.

Citing Articles

Surgical Inflammation Alters Immune Response to Intraoperative Photodynamic Therapy.

Davis 4th R, Klampatsa A, Cramer G, Kim M, Miller J, Yuan M Cancer Res Commun. 2023; 3(9):1810-1822.

PMID: 37700795 PMC: 10494787. DOI: 10.1158/2767-9764.CRC-22-0494.


Photodynamic therapy induced cell cycle arrest and cancer cell synchronization: review.

Moloudi K, Abrahamse H, George B Front Oncol. 2023; 13:1225694.

PMID: 37503319 PMC: 10369002. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1225694.


Blood Flow Measurements Enable Optimization of Light Delivery for Personalized Photodynamic Therapy.

Ong Y, Miller J, Yuan M, Chandra M, Khatib M, Vinogradov S Cancers (Basel). 2020; 12(6).

PMID: 32549354 PMC: 7353010. DOI: 10.3390/cancers12061584.


Synchronous delivery of oxygen and photosensitizer for alleviation of hypoxia tumor microenvironment and dramatically enhanced photodynamic therapy.

Guo X, Qu J, Zhu C, Li W, Luo L, Yang J Drug Deliv. 2018; 25(1):585-599.

PMID: 29461122 PMC: 6058564. DOI: 10.1080/10717544.2018.1435751.


Early assessment of tumor response to photodynamic therapy using combined diffuse optical and diffuse correlation spectroscopy to predict treatment outcome.

Thong P, Lee K, Toh H, Dong J, Tee C, Low K Oncotarget. 2017; 8(12):19902-19913.

PMID: 28423634 PMC: 5386732. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.15720.


References
1.
Foster T, Murant R, Bryant R, Knox R, Gibson S, HILF R . Oxygen consumption and diffusion effects in photodynamic therapy. Radiat Res. 1991; 126(3):296-303. DOI: 10.2307/3577919. View

2.
Yu G, Durduran T, Zhou C, Wang H, Putt M, Saunders H . Noninvasive monitoring of murine tumor blood flow during and after photodynamic therapy provides early assessment of therapeutic efficacy. Clin Cancer Res. 2005; 11(9):3543-52. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-2582. View

3.
Fingar V, Taber S, Haydon P, Harrison L, Kempf S, Wieman T . Vascular damage after photodynamic therapy of solid tumors: a view and comparison of effect in pre-clinical and clinical models at the University of Louisville. In Vivo. 2000; 14(1):93-100. View

4.
Tsutsui H, MacRobert A, Curnow A, Rogowska A, Buonaccorsi G, Kato H . Optimisation of illumination for photodynamic therapy with mTHPC on normal colon and a transplantable tumour in rats. Lasers Med Sci. 2002; 17(2):101-9. DOI: 10.1007/s101030200017. View

5.
Busch T, Xing X, Yu G, Yodh A, Wileyto E, Wang H . Fluence rate-dependent intratumor heterogeneity in physiologic and cytotoxic responses to Photofrin photodynamic therapy. Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2009; 8(12):1683-93. PMC: 2834171. DOI: 10.1039/b9pp00004f. View