» Articles » PMID: 20724369

Tissue Contribution to the Mechanical Features of Diaphragmatic Initial Lymphatics

Overview
Journal J Physiol
Specialty Physiology
Date 2010 Aug 21
PMID 20724369
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The role of the mechanical properties of the initial lymphatic wall and of the surrounding tissue in supporting lymph formation and/or progression was studied in six anaesthetized, neuromuscularly blocked and mechanically ventilated rats. After mid-sternal thoracotomy, submesothelial initial lymphatics were identified on the pleural diaphragmatic surface through stereomicroscopy. An 'in vivo' lymphatic segment was prepared by securing two surgical threads around the vessel at a distance of ∼2.5 mm leaving the vessel in place. Two glass micropipettes were inserted into the lumen, one for intraluminar injections of 4.6 nl saline boluses and one for hydraulic pressure (Plymph) recording. The compliance of the vessel wall (Clymph) was calculated as the slope of the plot describing the change in segment volume as a function of the post-injection Plymph changes. Two superficial lymphatic vessel populations with a significantly different Clymph (6.7 ± 1.6 and 1.5 ± 0.4 nl mmHg−1 (mean ± S.E.M.), P < 0.001) were identified. In seven additional rats, the average elastic modulus of diaphragmatic tissue strips was determined by uniaxial tension tests to be 1.7 ± 0.3 MPa. Clymph calculated for an initial lymphatic completely surrounded by isotropic tissue was 0.068 nl mmHg−1, i.e. two orders of magnitude lower than in submesothelial lymphatics. Modelling of stress distribution in the lymphatic wall suggests that compliant vessels may act as reservoirs accommodating large absorbed fluid volumes, while lymphatics with stiffer walls serve to propel fluid through the lumen of the lymphatic vessel by taking advantage of the more efficient mechanical transmission of tissue stresses to the lymphatic lumen.

Citing Articles

Effect of valve spacing on peristaltic pumping.

Wolf K, Poorghani A, Dixon J, Alexeev A Bioinspir Biomim. 2023; 18(3).

PMID: 36821859 PMC: 9997067. DOI: 10.1088/1748-3190/acbe85.


Morphological, Mechanical and Hydrodynamic Aspects of Diaphragmatic Lymphatics.

Negrini D Biology (Basel). 2022; 11(12).

PMID: 36552311 PMC: 9775868. DOI: 10.3390/biology11121803.


Dermal Lymphatic Capillaries Do Not Obey Murray's Law.

Talkington A, Davis R, Datto N, Goodwin E, Miller L, Caron K Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022; 9:840305.

PMID: 35498025 PMC: 9039365. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.840305.


Draining the Pleural Space: Lymphatic Vessels Facing the Most Challenging Task.

Solari E, Marcozzi C, Ottaviani C, Negrini D, Moriondo A Biology (Basel). 2022; 11(3).

PMID: 35336793 PMC: 8945018. DOI: 10.3390/biology11030419.


Lymphatic Vessel Network Structure and Physiology.

Breslin J, Yang Y, Scallan J, Sweat R, Adderley S, Murfee W Compr Physiol. 2018; 9(1):207-299.

PMID: 30549020 PMC: 6459625. DOI: 10.1002/cphy.c180015.


References
1.
Negrini D, Fabbro M, Gonano C, Mukenge S, Miserocchi G . Distribution of diaphragmatic lymphatic lacunae. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1992; 72(3):1166-72. DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1992.72.3.1166. View

2.
Navajas D, Mijailovich S, Glass G, Stamenovic D, Fredberg J . Dynamic response of the isolated passive rat diaphragm strip. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1992; 73(6):2681-92. DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1992.73.6.2681. View

3.
Moriondo A, Bianchin F, Marcozzi C, Negrini D . Kinetics of fluid flux in the rat diaphragmatic submesothelial lymphatic lacunae. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2008; 295(3):H1182-H1190. DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00369.2008. View

4.
Schmid-Schonbein G . Microlymphatics and lymph flow. Physiol Rev. 1990; 70(4):987-1028. DOI: 10.1152/physrev.1990.70.4.987. View

5.
Wang N . The preformed stomas connecting the pleural cavity and the lymphatics in the parietal pleura. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1975; 111(1):12-20. DOI: 10.1164/arrd.1975.111.1.12. View