What is Behind Smoker Support for New Smokefree Areas? National Survey Data

Overview

Journal BMC Public Health

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Public Health

Date 2010 Aug 20

PMID 20718985

Citations 7

Authors

Nick Wilson

Deepa Weerasekera

Tony Blakely

Richard Edwards

George Thomson

Heather Gifford

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Some countries have started to extend indoor smokefree laws to cover cars and various outdoor settings. However, policy-modifiable factors around smoker support for these new laws are not well described.

Methods: The New Zealand (NZ) arm of the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Survey (ITC Project) derives its sample from the NZ Health Survey (a national sample). From this sample we surveyed adult smokers (n = 1376).

Results: For the six settings considered, 59% of smokers supported at least three new completely smokefree areas. Only 2% favoured smoking being allowed in all the six new settings. Support among Maori, Pacific and Asian smokers relative to European smokers was elevated in multivariate analyses, but confidence intervals often included 1.0.Also in the multivariate analyses, "strong support" by smokers for new smokefree area laws was associated with greater knowledge of the second-hand smoke (SHS) hazard, and with behaviours to reduce SHS exposure towards others. Strong support was also associated with reporting having smokefree cars (aOR = 1.68, 95% CI = 1.21 - 2.34); and support for tobacco control regulatory measures by government (aOR = 1.63, 95% CI = 1.32 - 2.01). There was also stronger support by smokers with a form of financial stress (not spending on household essentials).

Conclusions: Smokers from a range of population groups can show majority support for new outdoor and smokefree car laws. Some of these findings are consistent with the use of public health strategies to support new smokefree laws, such as enhancing public knowledge of the second-hand smoke hazard.

Citing Articles

Support for regulating smoking in private and public places by adults who currently smoke and recently quit smoking in Spain.

Fu M, Castellano Y, Tigova O, Perez-Rios M, Driezen P, Kaai S Tob Induc Dis. 2024; 22.

PMID: 39220715 PMC: 11365038. DOI: 10.18332/tid/191797.

Support for smoke-free policy among Malaysian adults: findings from a population-based study.

Hock L, Li L, Huey T, Yuvaneswary V, Sayan P, Muhd Yusoff M BMJ Open. 2019; 9(2):e020304.

PMID: 30760510 PMC: 6377523. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020304.

To Regulate or Not to Regulate? Views on Electronic Cigarette Regulations and Beliefs about the Reasons for and against Regulation.

Sanders-Jackson A, Tan A, Bigman C, Mello S, Niederdeppe J PLoS One. 2016; 11(8):e0161124.

PMID: 27517716 PMC: 4982617. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161124.

Secondhand smoke in outdoor settings: smokers' consumption, non-smokers' perceptions, and attitudes towards smoke-free legislation in Spain.

Sureda X, Fernandez E, Martinez-Sanchez J, Fu M, Lopez M, Martinez C BMJ Open. 2015; 5(4):e007554.

PMID: 25854974 PMC: 4390691. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007554.

Public support for smoke-free air strategies among smokers and nonsmokers, New York City, 2010-2012.

Waddell E, Farley S, Mandel-Ricci J, Kansagra S Prev Chronic Dis. 2014; 11:130263.

PMID: 24480633 PMC: 3917610. DOI: 10.5888/pcd11.130263.

References

Rees V, Connolly G . Measuring air quality to protect children from secondhand smoke in cars. Am J Prev Med. 2006; 31(5):363-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2006.07.021. View

Siahpush M, Yong H, Borland R, Reid J, Hammond D . Smokers with financial stress are more likely to want to quit but less likely to try or succeed: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey. Addiction. 2009; 104(8):1382-90. PMC: 2714876. DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02599.x. View

Walsh R, Paul C, Tzelepis F, Stojanovski E, Tang A . Is government action out-of-step with public opinion on tobacco control? Results of a New South Wales population survey. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2008; 32(5):482-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2008.00284.x. View

Victora C, Huttly S, Fuchs S, Olinto M . The role of conceptual frameworks in epidemiological analysis: a hierarchical approach. Int J Epidemiol. 1997; 26(1):224-7. DOI: 10.1093/ije/26.1.224. View

Thomson G, Wilson N, Edwards R, Woodward A . Should smoking in outside public spaces be banned? Yes. BMJ. 2008; 337:a2806. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.a2806. View

Hopkins D, Briss P, Ricard C, Husten C, Fielding J, Alao M . Reviews of evidence regarding interventions to reduce tobacco use and exposure to environmental tobacco smoke. Am J Prev Med. 2001; 20(2 Suppl):16-66. DOI: 10.1016/s0749-3797(00)00297-x. View

Fichtenberg C, Glantz S . Effect of smoke-free workplaces on smoking behaviour: systematic review. BMJ. 2002; 325(7357):188. PMC: 117445. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.325.7357.188. View

Lazuras L, Rodafinos A, Panagiotakos D, Thyrian J, John U, Polychronopoulos E . Support for smoke-free policies in a pro-smoking culture: findings from the European survey on tobacco control attitudes and knowledge. Int J Public Health. 2009; 54(6):403-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00038-009-0074-2. View

Edwards R, Thomson G, Wilson N, Waa A, Bullen C, ODea D . After the smoke has cleared: evaluation of the impact of a new national smoke-free law in New Zealand. Tob Control. 2008; 17(1):e2. DOI: 10.1136/tc.2007.020347. View

10.

Young D, Borland R, Siahpush M, Hastings G, Fong G, Cummings K . Australian smokers support stronger regulatory controls on tobacco: findings from the ITC Four-Country Survey. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2007; 31(2):164-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2007.00035.x. View

11.

Grigg M, Waa A, Bradbrook S . Response to an indigenous smoking cessation media campaign - it's about whānau. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2008; 32(6):559-64. DOI: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2008.00310.x. View

12.

Wilson N, Weerasekera D, Edwards R, Thomson G, Devlin M, Gifford H . Characteristics of smoker support for increasing a dedicated tobacco tax: national survey data from New Zealand. Nicotine Tob Res. 2009; 12(2):168-73. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntp178. View

13.

McMillen R, Winickoff J, Klein J, Weitzman M . US adult attitudes and practices regarding smoking restrictions and child exposure to environmental tobacco smoke: changes in the social climate from 2000-2001. Pediatrics. 2003; 112(1 Pt 1):e55-60. DOI: 10.1542/peds.112.1.e55. View

14.

Wilson N, Blakely T, Edwards R, Weerasekera D, Thomson G . Support by New Zealand smokers for new types of smokefree areas: national survey data. N Z Med J. 2009; 122(1303):80-9. View

15.

Thrasher J, Perez-Hernandez R, Swayampakala K, Arillo-Santillan E, Bottai M . Policy support, norms, and secondhand smoke exposure before and after implementation of a comprehensive smoke-free law in Mexico city. Am J Public Health. 2010; 100(9):1789-98. PMC: 2920995. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.180950. View

16.

Stevenson A, Bradshaw R, Cook J, Cunningham R, Riddick L, Miller R . Majority of smokers and non-smokers in favour of smokefree parks in New Zealand. N Z Med J. 2008; 121(1274):108-10. View

17.

Borland R, Yong H, Cummings K, Hyland A, Anderson S, Fong G . Determinants and consequences of smoke-free homes: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey. Tob Control. 2006; 15 Suppl 3:iii42-50. PMC: 2593064. DOI: 10.1136/tc.2005.012492. View

18.

Klein E, Forster J, McFadden B, Outley C . Minnesota tobacco-free park policies: attitudes of the general public and park officials. Nicotine Tob Res. 2007; 9 Suppl 1:S49-55. DOI: 10.1080/14622200601083467. View

19.

Thomson G, Wilson N . Public attitudes to laws for smoke-free private vehicles: a brief review. Tob Control. 2008; 18(4):256-61. DOI: 10.1136/tc.2008.027672. View

20.

Hammond D, Fong G, Zanna M, Thrasher J, Borland R . Tobacco denormalization and industry beliefs among smokers from four countries. Am J Prev Med. 2006; 31(3):225-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2006.04.004. View