» Articles » PMID: 20718576

Attention to Hierarchical Level Influences Attentional Selection of Spatial Scale

Overview
Specialty Psychology
Date 2010 Aug 20
PMID 20718576
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Ample evidence suggests that global perception may involve low spatial frequency (LSF) processing and that local perception may involve high spatial frequency (HSF) processing (Shulman, Sullivan, Gish, & Sakoda, 1986; Shulman & Wilson, 1987; Robertson, 1996). It is debated whether SF selection is a low-level mechanism associating global and local information with absolute LSF and HSF content, or whether it is a higher level mechanism involving a selective process that defines the SF range in which global and local can then be relatively defined. The present study provides support for the latter claim by demonstrating that allocating attention to global or local levels of hierarchical displays biased selection of LSFs or HSFs, respectively, in subsequently presented compound gratings. This bias occurred despite a change in the response dimension (from letter identification in the hierarchical stimulus to orientation discrimination in the grating) and despite a difference in retinal location of the hierarchical stimuli and the grating stimulus. Moreover, the bias was determined by the relationship between the 2 SFs in the compound grating (i.e., their relative frequency) rather than the absolute SF values.

Citing Articles

The Effect of Prior Viewing Position and Spatial Scale on the Viewing of Paintings.

Trawinski T, Mestry N, Donnelly N Vision (Basel). 2023; 7(3).

PMID: 37756129 PMC: 10534493. DOI: 10.3390/vision7030055.


Global and local priming in a multi-modal context.

List A Front Hum Neurosci. 2023; 16:1043475.

PMID: 36926378 PMC: 10011069. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.1043475.


Spatial Frequency Tuning of Body Inversion Effects.

DArgenio G, Finisguerra A, Urgesi C Brain Sci. 2023; 13(2).

PMID: 36831733 PMC: 9954120. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13020190.


The Time Sequence of Face Spatial Frequency Differs During Working Memory Encoding and Retrieval Stages.

Wang A, Chen E, Zhang H, Borjigin C, Wang H Front Psychol. 2022; 13:853992.

PMID: 35668961 PMC: 9165599. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.853992.


The Influence of Inhibition of Return and Level-Priming on the Global Precedence Effect.

Wu Y, Li Q, Liu Y Comput Intell Neurosci. 2020; 2020:4817901.

PMID: 32952542 PMC: 7482029. DOI: 10.1155/2020/4817901.


References
1.
Ostwald D, Lam J, Li S, Kourtzi Z . Neural coding of global form in the human visual cortex. J Neurophysiol. 2008; 99(5):2456-69. DOI: 10.1152/jn.01307.2007. View

2.
Fink G, Halligan P, Marshall J, Frith C, Frackowiak R, Dolan R . Neural mechanisms involved in the processing of global and local aspects of hierarchically organized visual stimuli. Brain. 1997; 120 ( Pt 10):1779-91. DOI: 10.1093/brain/120.10.1779. View

3.
Sergent J . The cerebral balance of power: confrontation or cooperation?. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1982; 8(2):253-72. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.8.2.253. View

4.
Lamb M, Robertson L, Knight R . Attention and interference in the processing of global and local information: effects of unilateral temporal-parietal junction lesions. Neuropsychologia. 1989; 27(4):471-83. DOI: 10.1016/0028-3932(89)90052-3. View

5.
Gosselin F, Schyns P . Bubbles: a technique to reveal the use of information in recognition tasks. Vision Res. 2001; 41(17):2261-71. DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(01)00097-9. View