Ecosystem Services and Agriculture: Tradeoffs and Synergies

Overview

Journal Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci

Specialty Biology

Date 2010 Aug 18

PMID 20713396

Citations 156

Authors

Alison G Power

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Agricultural ecosystems provide humans with food, forage, bioenergy and pharmaceuticals and are essential to human wellbeing. These systems rely on ecosystem services provided by natural ecosystems, including pollination, biological pest control, maintenance of soil structure and fertility, nutrient cycling and hydrological services. Preliminary assessments indicate that the value of these ecosystem services to agriculture is enormous and often underappreciated. Agroecosystems also produce a variety of ecosystem services, such as regulation of soil and water quality, carbon sequestration, support for biodiversity and cultural services. Depending on management practices, agriculture can also be the source of numerous disservices, including loss of wildlife habitat, nutrient runoff, sedimentation of waterways, greenhouse gas emissions, and pesticide poisoning of humans and non-target species. The tradeoffs that may occur between provisioning services and other ecosystem services and disservices should be evaluated in terms of spatial scale, temporal scale and reversibility. As more effective methods for valuing ecosystem services become available, the potential for 'win-win' scenarios increases. Under all scenarios, appropriate agricultural management practices are critical to realizing the benefits of ecosystem services and reducing disservices from agricultural activities.

Citing Articles

Hidden Hunger in the Age of Abundance: The Nutritional Pitfalls of Modern Staple Crops.

Yilmaz H, Yilmaz A Food Sci Nutr. 2025; 13(2):e4610.

PMID: 39901987 PMC: 11788495. DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.4610.

Restoring riparian habitats for benefits to biodiversity and human livelihoods: a systematic map protocol for riparian restoration approaches in the tropics.

Davis S, Grainger M, Pfeifer M, Pattison Z, Stephens P, Sanderson R Environ Evid. 2025; 14(1):2.

PMID: 39885550 PMC: 11780855. DOI: 10.1186/s13750-025-00355-8.

Natural Increases in Parasitoid and Predator Abundances and a Shift in Species Dominance Point to Improved Suppression of the Sorghum Aphid Since Its Invasion into North America.

Bradicich P, Faris A, Gordy J, Brewer M Insects. 2025; 15(12.

PMID: 39769560 PMC: 11678016. DOI: 10.3390/insects15120958.

New York State Climate Impacts Assessment Chapter 05: Ecosystems.

Hess S, Burns D, Boudinot F, Brown-Lima C, Corwin J, Foppert J Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2024; 1542(1):253-340.

PMID: 39652386 PMC: 11668510. DOI: 10.1111/nyas.15203.

New York State Climate Impacts Assessment Chapter 03: Agriculture.

Aller D, Chatrchyan A, Calixto A, Cummings J, Ortiz-Bobea A, Peck G Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2024; 1542(1):146-213.

PMID: 39652373 PMC: 11668505. DOI: 10.1111/nyas.15192.

References

Searchinger T, Heimlich R, Houghton R, Dong F, Elobeid A, Fabiosa J . Use of U.S. croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use change. Science. 2008; 319(5867):1238-40. DOI: 10.1126/science.1151861. View

Eigenbrod F, Anderson B, Armsworth P, Heinemeyer A, Jackson S, Parnell M . Ecosystem service benefits of contrasting conservation strategies in a human-dominated region. Proc Biol Sci. 2009; 276(1669):2903-11. PMC: 2817206. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2009.0528. View

Bianchi F, Booij C, Tscharntke T . Sustainable pest regulation in agricultural landscapes: a review on landscape composition, biodiversity and natural pest control. Proc Biol Sci. 2006; 273(1595):1715-27. PMC: 1634792. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2006.3530. View

Jackson R, Jobbagy E, Avissar R, Roy S, Barrett D, Cook C . Trading water for carbon with biological carbon sequestration. Science. 2005; 310(5756):1944-7. DOI: 10.1126/science.1119282. View

Kremen C, Williams N, Aizen M, Gemmill-Herren B, LeBuhn G, Minckley R . Pollination and other ecosystem services produced by mobile organisms: a conceptual framework for the effects of land-use change. Ecol Lett. 2007; 10(4):299-314. DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01018.x. View

Aizen M, Garibaldi L, Cunningham S, Klein A . How much does agriculture depend on pollinators? Lessons from long-term trends in crop production. Ann Bot. 2009; 103(9):1579-88. PMC: 2701761. DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcp076. View

Maes W, Heuvelmans G, Muys B . Assessment of land use impact on water-related ecosystem services capturing the integrated terrestrial-aquatic system. Environ Sci Technol. 2009; 43(19):7324-30. DOI: 10.1021/es900613w. View

Klein A, Vaissiere B, Cane J, Steffan-Dewenter I, Cunningham S, Kremen C . Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops. Proc Biol Sci. 2006; 274(1608):303-13. PMC: 1702377. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2006.3721. View

Smith P, Martino D, Cai Z, Gwary D, Janzen H, Kumar P . Greenhouse gas mitigation in agriculture. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2007; 363(1492):789-813. PMC: 2610110. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2007.2184. View

10.

Vitousek P, Naylor R, Crews T, David M, Drinkwater L, Holland E . Agriculture. Nutrient imbalances in agricultural development. Science. 2009; 324(5934):1519-20. DOI: 10.1126/science.1170261. View

11.

Kleijn D, Baquero R, Clough Y, Diaz M, De Esteban J, Fernandez F . Mixed biodiversity benefits of agri-environment schemes in five European countries. Ecol Lett. 2006; 9(3):243-54. DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00869.x. View

12.

Landis D, Gardiner M, Van der Werf W, Swinton S . Increasing corn for biofuel production reduces biocontrol services in agricultural landscapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008; 105(51):20552-7. PMC: 2603255. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0804951106. View

13.

Stoate C, Baldi A, Beja P, Boatman N, Herzon I, van Doorn A . Ecological impacts of early 21st century agricultural change in Europe--a review. J Environ Manage. 2009; 91(1):22-46. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.07.005. View

14.

Steffan-Dewenter I, Kessler M, Barkmann J, Bos M, Buchori D, Erasmi S . Tradeoffs between income, biodiversity, and ecosystem functioning during tropical rainforest conversion and agroforestry intensification. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007; 104(12):4973-8. PMC: 1829249. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0608409104. View

15.

Matson P, Parton W, Power A, Swift M . Agricultural intensification and ecosystem properties. Science. 2010; 277(5325):504-9. DOI: 10.1126/science.277.5325.504. View

16.

Gardiner M, Landis D, Gratton C, DiFonzo C, ONeal M, Chacon J . Landscape diversity enhances biological control of an introduced crop pest in the north-central USA. Ecol Appl. 2009; 19(1):143-54. DOI: 10.1890/07-1265.1. View

17.

Perfecto I, Vandermeer J . Biodiversity conservation in tropical agroecosystems: a new conservation paradigm. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008; 1134:173-200. DOI: 10.1196/annals.1439.011. View

18.

Fargione J, Hill J, Tilman D, Polasky S, Hawthorne P . Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt. Science. 2008; 319(5867):1235-8. DOI: 10.1126/science.1152747. View

19.

Pretty J, Noble A, Bossio D, DIXON J, Hine R, Penning De Vries F . Resource-conserving agriculture increases yields in developing countries. Environ Sci Technol. 2006; 40(4):1114-9. DOI: 10.1021/es051670d. View

20.

Tallis H, Polasky S . Mapping and valuing ecosystem services as an approach for conservation and natural-resource management. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009; 1162:265-83. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04152.x. View