» Articles » PMID: 20713182

Feasibility of a Longitudinal Study of Women Anticipating First Pregnancy and Assessed by Multiple Pelvic Exams: Recruitment and Retention Challenges

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2010 Aug 18
PMID 20713182
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To better understand the relationship between childbirth and pelvic floor disorders the ideal study design would begin with data collection prior to but close in time to first pregnancy and follow participants through postpartum. We conducted a feasibility study to determine the following: a) whether women desiring to get pregnant would agree to pre-pregnancy data collection including a one-time urethral catheter measure and repeat pelvic exams to ascertain a baseline within 6 months of pregnancy; b) effectiveness of various recruitment and retention methods, c) number achieving pregnancy, and then d) number expressing willingness to continue follow-up through pregnancy and postpartum.

Methods: Advertising included newspaper ads, targeted emails and flyers. Post-enrollment, four data collection visits were scheduled and occurred every 6 months or until pregnant. If pregnancy occurred, women were asked to indicate their willingness to continue assessments.

Results: The most successful advertising strategy for both recruitment and retention was local newspaper ads. Ninety-four women inquired about the study, 30 enrolled. Post-baseline retention was 23 women at 6 months, 17 at 12 months, and 13 at 18 months. Nine of the 30 women achieved pregnancy; two remained eligible and willing to participate through pregnancy and postpartum.

Conclusions: This study provides data on feasibility of recruiting women to establish near-pregnancy clinical baseline measures that include pelvic exams. Close to 30% reached pregnancy within 2 years of study start and within 6 months of most recent pelvic exam measure. Of those who became pregnant, 22% expressed willingness to continue follow-up into the childbearing year.

Citing Articles

Recruitment and Retention of Urban Pregnant Women to a Clinical Study Administering an Oral Isotope Dietary Tracer.

Koenig M, Tussing-Humphreys L, deMartelly V, LaBomascus B, OjiNjideka Hemphill N, Welke L Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2022; 3(1):652-660.

PMID: 35982776 PMC: 9380878. DOI: 10.1089/whr.2022.0015.


The Food, Feelings, and Family Study: comparison of the efficacy of traditional methods, social media, and broadcast email to recruit pregnant women to an observational, longitudinal nutrition study.

Smith R, Alvarez C, Crixell S, Lane M BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021; 21(1):203.

PMID: 33711946 PMC: 7953646. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-021-03680-1.


Longitudinal Study of Pelvic Floor Characteristics Before, During, and After Pregnancy in Nulliparous Women.

Lakovschek I, Trutnovsky G, Obermayer-Pietsch B, Gold D J Ultrasound Med. 2021; 41(1):147-155.

PMID: 33682186 PMC: 9291937. DOI: 10.1002/jum.15689.


Retention strategies in longitudinal cohort studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Teague S, Youssef G, Macdonald J, Sciberras E, Shatte A, Fuller-Tyszkiewicz M BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018; 18(1):151.

PMID: 30477443 PMC: 6258319. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-018-0586-7.


Windows of Opportunity for Lifestyle Interventions to Prevent Gestational Diabetes Mellitus.

Phelan S Am J Perinatol. 2016; 33(13):1291-1299.

PMID: 27487229 PMC: 5685171. DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1586504.


References
1.
Miller J, Ashton-Miller J, Perruchini D, DeLancey J . Test-retest reliability of an instrumented speculum for measuring vaginal closure force. Neurourol Urodyn. 2007; 26(6):858-63. PMC: 2743035. DOI: 10.1002/nau.20407. View

2.
Marmor J, Oliveria S, Donahue R, Garrahie E, White M, Moore L . Factors encouraging cohort maintenance in a longitudinal study. J Clin Epidemiol. 1991; 44(6):531-5. DOI: 10.1016/0895-4356(91)90216-v. View

3.
Bump R, Mattiasson A, Bo K, Brubaker L, DeLancey J, Klarskov P . The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996; 175(1):10-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70243-0. View

4.
Hilden M, Sidenius K, Langhoff-Roos J, Wijma B, Schei B . Women's experiences of the gynecologic examination: factors associated with discomfort. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003; 82(11):1030-6. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0412.2003.00253.x. View

5.
ENHORNING G . Simultaneous recording of intravesical and intra-urethral pressure. A study on urethral closure in normal and stress incontinent women. Acta Chir Scand Suppl. 1961; Suppl 276:1-68. View