» Articles » PMID: 20711737

Surgical Treatment Concepts for Patients with Pancreatic Cancer in Germany--results from a National Survey Conducted Among Members of the "Chirurgische Arbeitsgemeinschaft Onkologie" (CAO) and the "Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie" (AIO)...

Overview
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2010 Aug 17
PMID 20711737
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: To date, only limited data are available regarding the routine surgical management of patients with exocrine pancreatic cancer (PC) in German community and university hospitals.

Methods: With the use of a standardized questionnaire, a national survey on surgical and oncological treatment concepts for PC in Germany was conducted on behalf of the Chirurgische Arbeitsgemeinschaft Onkologie and Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie. The surgical part of that questionnaire contained 25 questions on criteria regarding resectability, surgical techniques, perioperative patient management, and palliative surgical procedures in advanced PC. Data were collected centrally and analyzed using the SPSS(®) software. Additionally, predefined subgroup analyses, classifying the results by the professional site of the responding physician and the local annual number of treated patients, were carried out.

Results: One-hundred and two questionnaires on the surgical survey section were returned. For the majority of the survey respondents, arterial infiltration is the most important criterion for non-resectability of PC (common hepatic artery, 69.9%; superior mesenteric artery, 85.3%; celiac trunk, 86.3%), whereas only 17.6% would define non-resectability based on portal vein infiltration; 69.9% consider extrapancreatic tumor manifestations as a criterion of surgical non-resectability. Of the survey participants, 53.9% perform a biliary drainage in case of preoperative cholestasis, whereas 43.1% reject this preoperative endoscopic-interventional approach. For cancers of the pancreatic head, 24.5% of surgical units recommend a classical Kausch-Whipple procedure, 52.9% prefer the pylorus-preserving partial pancreatoduodenectomy, and 20.6% use both procedures; 74.5% routinely perform a standard lymphadenectomy, whereas 16.7% prefer an extended procedure. A radical pancreatic resection would be performed by 63.7% of survey respondents also if a single liver metastasis would be found intraoperatively.

Conclusion: Surgical treatment of PC in Germany is heterogeneous; future efforts to implement an evidence-based and standardized surgical management will be necessary.

Citing Articles

Perioperative outcome of Whipple's procedure with special attention to the impact of preoperative biliary drainage: a real-life scenario.

Ray S, Das S, Mandal T, Jana K, DAS R, Kumar D Updates Surg. 2021; 73(5):1735-1745.

PMID: 33811607 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-021-01038-y.


[Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis for pancreas resections with and without preoperative bile drainage : Is there room for improvement?].

Dimitriou I, Bultmann U, Niedergethmann M Chirurg. 2019; 90(7):557-563.

PMID: 30635700 DOI: 10.1007/s00104-018-0781-4.


[Treatment of retroperitoneal sarcoma in Germany : Results of a survey of the German Society of General and Visceral Surgery, the German Interdisciplinary Sarcoma Study Group and the advocacy group Das Lebenshaus].

Jakob J, Gerres A, Ronellenfitsch U, Pilz L, Wartenberg M, Kasper B Chirurg. 2017; 89(1):50-55.

PMID: 28905080 DOI: 10.1007/s00104-017-0504-2.


Pancreatoduodenectomy--current status of surgical and perioperative techniques in Germany.

Haane C, Mardin W, Schmitz B, Dhayat S, Hummel R, Senninger N Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2013; 398(8):1097-105.

PMID: 24141987 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-013-1130-1.


Extended distal pancreatectomy with en bloc resection of the celiac axis for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a case report and review of the literature.

Alizai P, Mahnken A, Klink C, Neumann U, Junge K Case Rep Med. 2012; 2012:543167.

PMID: 22567019 PMC: 3332186. DOI: 10.1155/2012/543167.


References
1.
Van Der Gaag N, Rauws E, van Eijck C, Bruno M, van der Harst E, Kubben F . Preoperative biliary drainage for cancer of the head of the pancreas. N Engl J Med. 2010; 362(2):129-37. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0903230. View

2.
Sasson A, Hoffman J, Ross E, Kagan S, Pingpank J, Eisenberg B . En bloc resection for locally advanced cancer of the pancreas: is it worthwhile?. J Gastrointest Surg. 2002; 6(2):147-57; discussion 157-8. DOI: 10.1016/s1091-255x(01)00063-4. View

3.
Wagner M, Redaelli C, Lietz M, Seiler C, Friess H, Buchler M . Curative resection is the single most important factor determining outcome in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Br J Surg. 2004; 91(5):586-94. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.4484. View

4.
Huser N, Michalski C, Schuster T, Friess H, Kleeff J . Systematic review and meta-analysis of prophylactic gastroenterostomy for unresectable advanced pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg. 2009; 96(7):711-9. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.6629. View

5.
Mezhir J, Brennan M, Baser R, DAngelica M, Fong Y, DeMatteo R . A matched case-control study of preoperative biliary drainage in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma: routine drainage is not justified. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009; 13(12):2163-9. DOI: 10.1007/s11605-009-1046-9. View