» Articles » PMID: 20706541

Learning Arm/hand Coordination with an Altered Visual Input

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2010 Aug 14
PMID 20706541
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The focus of this study was to test a novel tool for the analysis of motor coordination with an altered visual input. The altered visual input was created using special glasses that presented the view as recorded by a video camera placed at various positions around the subject. The camera was positioned at a frontal (F), lateral (L), or top (T) position with respect to the subject. We studied the differences between the arm-end (wrist) trajectories while grasping an object between altered vision (F, L, and T conditions) and normal vision (N) in ten subjects. The outcome measures from the analysis were the trajectory errors, the movement parameters, and the time of execution. We found substantial trajectory errors and an increased execution time at the baseline of the study. We also found that trajectory errors decreased in all conditions after three days of practice with the altered vision in the F condition only for 20 minutes per day, suggesting that recalibration of the visual systems occurred relatively quickly. These results indicate that this recalibration occurs via movement training in an altered condition. The results also suggest that recalibration is more difficult to achieve for altered vision in the F and L conditions compared to the T condition. This study has direct implications on the design of new rehabilitation systems.

References
1.
Chieffi S, Gentilucci M . Coordination between the transport and the grasp components during prehension movements. Exp Brain Res. 1993; 94(3):471-7. DOI: 10.1007/BF00230205. View

2.
Goodbody S, Wolpert D . Temporal and amplitude generalization in motor learning. J Neurophysiol. 1998; 79(4):1825-38. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1998.79.4.1825. View

3.
Clower D, Boussaoud D . Selective use of perceptual recalibration versus visuomotor skill acquisition. J Neurophysiol. 2000; 84(5):2703-8. DOI: 10.1152/jn.2000.84.5.2703. View

4.
Ferrel C, Leifflen D, Orliaguet J, Coello Y . Pointing movement visually controlled through a video display: adaptation to scale change. Ergonomics. 2000; 43(4):461-73. DOI: 10.1080/001401300184341. View

5.
Servos P, Goodale M, Jakobson L . The role of binocular vision in prehension: a kinematic analysis. Vision Res. 1992; 32(8):1513-21. DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(92)90207-y. View