Explaining Lexical-semantic Deficits in Specific Language Impairment: the Role of Phonological Similarity, Phonological Working Memory, and Lexical Competition

Overview

Journal J Speech Lang Hear Res

Date 2010 Aug 14

PMID 20705746

Citations 23

Authors

Elina Mainela-Arnold

Julia L Evans

Jeffry A Coady

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: In this study, the authors investigated potential explanations for sparse lexical-semantic representations in children with specific language impairment (SLI) and typically developing peers. The role of auditory perception, phonological working memory, and lexical competition were investigated.

Method: Participants included 32 children (ages 8;5-12;3 [years;months]): Sixteen children with SLI and 16 typically developing age- and nonverbal IQ-matched peers (CA). Children's word definitions were investigated. The words to be defined were manipulated for phonological neighborhood density. Nonword repetition and two lexical competition measures were tested as predictors of word definition abilities.

Results: Children with SLI gave word definitions with fewer content details than children in the CA group. Compared with the CA group, the definitions of children in the SLI group were not disproportionately impacted by phonological neighborhood density. Lexical competition was a significant unique predictor of children's word definitions, but nonword repetition was not.

Conclusions: Individual differences in richness of lexical semantic representations as well as differences between children with SLI and typically developing peers may-at least, in part-be explained by processes of competition. However, difficulty with auditory perception or phonological working memory does not fully explain difficulties in lexical semantics.

Citing Articles

Executive functions in children with developmental language disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Niu T, Wang S, Ma J, Zeng X, Xue R Front Neurosci. 2024; 18:1390987.

PMID: 39188807 PMC: 11345193. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1390987.

Lexical-semantic processing in preschoolers with Developmental Language Disorder: an eye tracking study.

Guerra E, Coloma C, Helo A Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1338517.

PMID: 38807960 PMC: 11131166. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1338517.

Word learning and verbal working memory in children with developmental language disorder.

Jackson E, Leitao S, Claessen M, Boyes M Autism Dev Lang Impair. 2022; 6:23969415211004109.

PMID: 36381524 PMC: 9620694. DOI: 10.1177/23969415211004109.

Neural patterns elicited by lexical processing in adolescents with specific language impairment: support for the procedural deficit hypothesis?.

Evans J, Maguire M, Sizemore M J Neurodev Disord. 2022; 14(1):20.

PMID: 35305572 PMC: 8934509. DOI: 10.1186/s11689-022-09419-z.

Speech production factors and verbal working memory in children and adults with developmental language disorder.

Poll G, Miller C Appl Psycholinguist. 2021; 42(3):673-702.

PMID: 34024959 PMC: 8135931. DOI: 10.1017/s0142716421000011.

References

Tallal P, Piercy M . Developmental aphasia: rate of auditory processing and selective impairment of consonant perception. Neuropsychologia. 1974; 12(1):83-93. DOI: 10.1016/0028-3932(74)90030-x. View

Fulkerson A, Waxman S . Words (but not tones) facilitate object categorization: evidence from 6- and 12-month-olds. Cognition. 2006; 105(1):218-28. PMC: 2099297. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.09.005. View

Gray S . The relationship between phonological memory, receptive vocabulary, and fast mapping in young children with specific language impairment. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2006; 49(5):955-69. DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2006/069). View

Tallal P, Piercy M . Developmental aphasia: impaired rate of non-verbal processing as a function of sensory modality. Neuropsychologia. 1973; 11(4):389-98. DOI: 10.1016/0028-3932(73)90025-0. View

Luce P, Pisoni D . Recognizing spoken words: the neighborhood activation model. Ear Hear. 1998; 19(1):1-36. PMC: 3467695. DOI: 10.1097/00003446-199802000-00001. View

Plunkett K, Hu J, Cohen L . Labels can override perceptual categories in early infancy. Cognition. 2007; 106(2):665-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.04.003. View

Gray S . Word-learning by preschoolers with specific language impairment: what predicts success?. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2003; 46(1):56-67. DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2003/005). View

Merzenich M, Jenkins W, Johnston P, Schreiner C, Miller S, Tallal P . Temporal processing deficits of language-learning impaired children ameliorated by training. Science. 1996; 271(5245):77-81. DOI: 10.1126/science.271.5245.77. View

Balaban M, Waxman S . Do words facilitate object categorization in 9-month-old infants?. J Exp Child Psychol. 1997; 64(1):3-26. DOI: 10.1006/jecp.1996.2332. View

10.

Dollaghan C . Fast mapping in normal and language-impaired children. J Speech Hear Disord. 1987; 52(3):218-22. DOI: 10.1044/jshd.5203.218. View

11.

Metsala J . An examination of word frequency and neighborhood density in the development of spoken-word recognition. Mem Cognit. 1997; 25(1):47-56. DOI: 10.3758/bf03197284. View

12.

Rice M, Oetting J, Marquis J, Bode J, Pae S . Frequency of input effects on word comprehension of children with specific language impairment. J Speech Hear Res. 1994; 37(1):106-22. DOI: 10.1044/jshr.3701.106. View

13.

Cutler A . Making up materials is a confounded nuisance, or: will we be able to run any psycholinguistic experiments at all in 1990?. Cognition. 1981; 10(1-3):65-70. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(81)90026-3. View

14.

Bishop D, North T, Donlan C . Nonword repetition as a behavioural marker for inherited language impairment: evidence from a twin study. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1996; 37(4):391-403. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1996.tb01420.x. View

15.

Tomblin J, Records N, Zhang X . A system for the diagnosis of specific language impairment in kindergarten children. J Speech Hear Res. 1996; 39(6):1284-94. DOI: 10.1044/jshr.3906.1284. View

16.

Magnuson J, Tanenhaus M, Aslin R, Dahan D . The time course of spoken word learning and recognition: studies with artificial lexicons. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2003; 132(2):202-27. DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.132.2.202. View

17.

Bowey . On the Association between Phonological Memory and Receptive Vocabulary in Five-Year-Olds. J Exp Child Psychol. 1996; 63(1):44-78. DOI: 10.1006/jecp.1996.0042. View

18.

Alt M, Plante E, Creusere M . Semantic features in fast-mapping: performance of preschoolers with specific language impairment versus preschoolers with normal language. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2004; 47(2):407-20. DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2004/033). View

19.

Mainela-Arnold E, Evans J, Coady J . Lexical representations in children with SLI: evidence from a frequency-manipulated gating task. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008; 51(2):381-93. PMC: 4707012. DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2008/028). View

20.

Tallal P, Piercy M . Defects of non-verbal auditory perception in children with developmental aphasia. Nature. 1973; 241(5390):468-9. DOI: 10.1038/241468a0. View