» Articles » PMID: 20703953

The Quality of Colonoscopy Services--responsibilities of Referring Clinicians: a Consensus Statement of the Quality Assurance Task Group, National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2010 Aug 13
PMID 20703953
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Primary care clinicians initiate and oversee colorectal screening for their patients, but colonoscopy, a central component of screening programs, is usually performed by consultants. The accuracy and safety of colonoscopy varies among endoscopists, even those with mainstream training and certification. Therefore, it is a primary care responsibility to choose the best available colonoscopy services. A working group of the National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable identified a set of indicators that primary care clinicians can use to assess the quality of colonoscopy services. Quality measures are of actual performance, not training, specialty, or experience alone. The main elements of quality are a complete report, technical competence, and a safe setting for the procedure. We provide explicit criteria that primary care physicians can use when choosing a colonoscopist. Information on quality indicators will be increasingly available with quality improvement efforts within the colonoscopy community and growth in the use of electronic medical records.

Citing Articles

Quality measures in endoscopy: A systematic analysis of the overall scientific level of evidence and conflicts of interest.

Weissman S, Aziz M, Baniqued M, Taneja V, El-Dallal M, Lee-Smith W Endosc Int Open. 2022; 10(6):E776-E786.

PMID: 35692919 PMC: 9187391. DOI: 10.1055/a-1809-4219.


An integrated electronic health record-based workflow to improve management of colonoscopy-generated pathology results.

Dorn S, Cirri H, Chang A, Crockett S, Galanko J, Baron J Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2018; 11:391-397.

PMID: 30323644 PMC: 6181114. DOI: 10.2147/CEG.S170757.


Challenges Implementing Lung Cancer Screening in Federally Qualified Health Centers.

Zeliadt S, Hoffman R, Birkby G, Eberth J, Brenner A, Reuland D Am J Prev Med. 2018; 54(4):568-575.

PMID: 29429606 PMC: 8483158. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.01.001.


Pilot Validation Study: Canadian Global Rating Scale for Colonoscopy Services.

Carpentier S, Sharara N, Barkun A, El Ouali S, Martel M, Sewitch M Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016; 2016:6982739.

PMID: 27840810 PMC: 5093241. DOI: 10.1155/2016/6982739.


Increased Detection of Colorectal Polyps in Screening Colonoscopy Using High Definition i-SCAN Compared with Standard White Light.

Kim W, Park S, Park I, Lee W, Park J, Chon N Clin Endosc. 2016; 49(1):69-75.

PMID: 26855927 PMC: 4743733. DOI: 10.5946/ce.2016.49.1.69.


References
1.
Mysliwiec P, Brown M, Klabunde C, Ransohoff D . Are physicians doing too much colonoscopy? A national survey of colorectal surveillance after polypectomy. Ann Intern Med. 2004; 141(4):264-71. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-141-4-200408170-00006. View

2.
Schoenfeld P, Cash B, Flood A, Dobhan R, Eastone J, Coyle W . Colonoscopic screening of average-risk women for colorectal neoplasia. N Engl J Med. 2005; 352(20):2061-8. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa042990. View

3.
Winawer S, Zauber A, Fletcher R, Stillman J, OBrien M, Levin B . Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society. Gastroenterology. 2006; 130(6):1872-85. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.03.012. View

4.
Imperiale T, Wagner D, Lin C, Larkin G, Rogge J, Ransohoff D . Results of screening colonoscopy among persons 40 to 49 years of age. N Engl J Med. 2002; 346(23):1781-5. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM200206063462304. View

5.
Ball J, Osbourne J, Jowett S, Pellen M, Welfare M . Quality improvement programme to achieve acceptable colonoscopy completion rates: prospective before and after study. BMJ. 2004; 329(7467):665-7. PMC: 517648. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.329.7467.665. View