When Are Sexual Difficulties Distressing for Women? The Selective Protective Value of Intimate Relationships

Overview

Journal J Sex Med

Publisher Oxford University Press

Specialties Gynecology & Obstetrics
Reproductive Medicine
Urology

Date 2010 Aug 13

PMID 20701676

Citations 15

Authors

Kyle R Stephenson

Cindy M Meston

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: Recent studies have shown that sexual functioning and sexually related personal distress are weakly related in women, with only a minority of sexual difficulties resulting in significant levels of distress. However, there has been little systematic research to date on which factors moderate the relationship between sexual functioning and sexual distress.

Aim: To assess the degree to which relational intimacy and attachment anxiety moderate the association between sexual functioning and sexual distress in college-age women.

Methods: Two hundred women (mean age=20.25) completed surveys assessing sexual functioning, relational intimacy, attachment anxiety, and sexual distress.

Main Outcome Measures: Participants completed the Sexual Satisfaction Scale for Women, the Female Sexual Function Index, the Dimensions of Relationship Quality Scale, and the Revised Experiences in Close Relationships Measure of Adult Romantic Attachment.

Results: Relational intimacy and attachment anxiety moderated the association between multiple aspects of sexual functioning and sexual distress. For lubrication and sexual pain, functioning was more strongly associated with distress in low-intimacy vs. high-intimacy relationships, but only for women with high levels of attachment anxiety. Results regarding desire were mixed and neither intimacy nor attachment anxiety interacted with subjective arousal or orgasm in predicting distress.

Conclusion: Both relational intimacy and attachment anxiety are important moderators of the association between sexual functioning and subjective sexual distress in women. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

Citing Articles

Impact of Hidradenitis Suppurativa on Sexual Quality of Life.

Caliezi A, Rabufetti A, Hunger R, Wolf R, Seyed Jafari S J Clin Med. 2025; 14(3).

PMID: 39941581 PMC: 11818454. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14030910.

Genital arousal and responsive desire among women with and without sexual interest/arousal disorder symptoms.

Blumenstock S, Suschinsky K, Brotto L, Chivers M J Sex Med. 2024; 21(6):539-547.

PMID: 38582607 PMC: 11144479. DOI: 10.1093/jsxmed/qdae036.

Efficacy and Safety of Platelet-Rich Plasma Injections for the Treatment of Female Sexual Dysfunction and Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Systematic Review.

Dankova I, Pyrgidis N, Tishukov M, Georgiadou E, Nigdelis M, Solomayer E Biomedicines. 2023; 11(11).

PMID: 38001920 PMC: 10669888. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11112919.

Profiles of women's adjustment after cancer based on sexual and psychosocial wellbeing: results of a cluster analysis.

Arthur E, Menon U, Reese J, Browning K, Overcash J, Rose K BMC Cancer. 2022; 22(1):1003.

PMID: 36131276 PMC: 9491007. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-10093-6.

Examining Associations Among Sexual Health, Unmet Care Needs, and Distress in Breast and Gynecologic Cancer Survivors.

Benedict C, Fisher S, Kumar D, Pollom E, Schapira L, Kurian A Semin Oncol Nurs. 2022; 38(6):151316.

PMID: 35902337 PMC: 9809304. DOI: 10.1016/j.soncn.2022.151316.

References

Birnbaum G, Reis H, Mikulincer M, Gillath O, Orpaz A . When sex is more than just sex: attachment orientations, sexual experience, and relationship quality. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006; 91(5):929-43. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.91.5.929. View

Sinclair V, Dowdy S . Development and validation of the Emotional Intimacy Scale. J Nurs Meas. 2006; 13(3):193-206. DOI: 10.1891/jnum.13.3.193. View

Meston C . Validation of the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) in women with female orgasmic disorder and in women with hypoactive sexual desire disorder. J Sex Marital Ther. 2003; 29(1):39-46. PMC: 2872178. DOI: 10.1080/713847100. View

Hayes R, Dennerstein L, Bennett C, Sidat M, Gurrin L, Fairley C . Risk factors for female sexual dysfunction in the general population: exploring factors associated with low sexual function and sexual distress. J Sex Med. 2008; 5(7):1681-93. DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2008.00838.x. View

Byers E . Relationship satisfaction and sexual satisfaction: a longitudinal study of individuals in long-term relationships. J Sex Res. 2005; 42(2):113-8. DOI: 10.1080/00224490509552264. View

Rosen R, Shifren J, Monz B, Odom D, Russo P, Johannes C . Correlates of sexually related personal distress in women with low sexual desire. J Sex Med. 2009; 6(6):1549-1560. DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01252.x. View

Barrientos J, Paez D . Psychosocial variables of sexual satisfaction in Chile. J Sex Marital Ther. 2006; 32(5):351-68. DOI: 10.1080/00926230600834695. View

Brody S, Costa R . Satisfaction (sexual, life, relationship, and mental health) is associated directly with penile-vaginal intercourse, but inversely with other sexual behavior frequencies. J Sex Med. 2009; 6(7):1947-54. DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01303.x. View

Tiefer L, Hall M, Tavris C . Beyond dysfunction: a new view of women's sexual problems. J Sex Marital Ther. 2002; 28 Suppl 1:225-32. DOI: 10.1080/00926230252851357. View

10.

Gunzler C, Kriston L, Harms A, Berner M . Association of sexual functioning and quality of partnership in patients in cardiovascular rehabilitation--a gender perspective. J Sex Med. 2009; 6(1):164-74. DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2008.01039.x. View

11.

LIEF H . Satisfaction and distress: disjunctions in the components of sexual response. J Sex Marital Ther. 2001; 27(2):169-70. DOI: 10.1080/00926230152051888. View

12.

Gerstenberger E, Rosen R, Brewer J, Meston C, Brotto L, Wiegel M . Sexual desire and the female sexual function index (FSFI): a sexual desire cutpoint for clinical interpretation of the FSFI in women with and without hypoactive sexual desire disorder. J Sex Med. 2010; 7(9):3096-103. DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.01871.x. View

13.

Hayes R, Dennerstein L, Bennett C, Fairley C . What is the "true" prevalence of female sexual dysfunctions and does the way we assess these conditions have an impact?. J Sex Med. 2008; 5(4):777-787. DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2007.00768.x. View

14.

Oberg K, Fugl-Meyer K . On Swedish women's distressing sexual dysfunctions: some concomitant conditions and life satisfaction. J Sex Med. 2006; 2(2):169-80. DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2005.20226.x. View

15.

Stephenson K, Meston C . Differentiating components of sexual well-being in women: are sexual satisfaction and sexual distress independent constructs?. J Sex Med. 2010; 7(7):2458-68. DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.01836.x. View

16.

Davis D, Shaver P, Vernon M . Attachment style and subjective motivations for sex. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2004; 30(8):1076-90. DOI: 10.1177/0146167204264794. View

17.

Collins N, Read S . Adult attachment, working models, and relationship quality in dating couples. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1990; 58(4):644-63. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.58.4.644. View

18.

Philippsohn S, Hartmann U . Determinants of sexual satisfaction in a sample of German women. J Sex Med. 2008; 6(4):1001-1010. DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2008.00989.x. View

19.

Meston C, Trapnell P . Development and validation of a five-factor sexual satisfaction and distress scale for women: the Sexual Satisfaction Scale for Women (SSS-W). J Sex Med. 2006; 2(1):66-81. PMC: 2859306. DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2005.20107.x. View

20.

Derogatis L, Rosen R, Leiblum S, Burnett A, Heiman J . The Female Sexual Distress Scale (FSDS): initial validation of a standardized scale for assessment of sexually related personal distress in women. J Sex Marital Ther. 2002; 28(4):317-30. DOI: 10.1080/00926230290001448. View