» Articles » PMID: 20698032

(+)-Methamphetamine-induced Monoamine Reductions and Impaired Egocentric Learning in Adrenalectomized Rats is Independent of Hyperthermia

Overview
Journal Synapse
Specialty Neurology
Date 2010 Aug 11
PMID 20698032
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Methamphetamine (MA) is widely abused and implicated in residual cognitive deficits. In rats, increases in plasma corticosterone and egocentric learning deficits are observed after a 1-day binge regimen of MA (10 mg/kg x 4 at 2-h intervals). The purpose of this experiment was to determine if adrenal inactivation during and following MA exposure would attenuate the egocentric learning deficits in the Cincinnati water maze (CWM). In the first experiment, the effects of adrenalectomy (ADX) or sham surgery (SHAM) on MA-induced neurotoxicity at 72 h were determined. SHAM-MA animals showed typical patterns of hyperthermia, whereas ADX-MA animals were normothermic. Both SHAM-MA- and ADX-MA-treated animals showed increased neostriatal glial fibrillary acidic protein and decreased monoamines in the neostriatum, hippocampus, and entorhinal cortex. In the second experiment, SHAM-MA- and ADX-MA-treated groups showed equivalently impaired CWM performance 2 weeks post-treatment (increased latencies, errors, and start returns) compared to SHAM-saline (SAL) and ADX-SAL groups with no effects on novel object recognition, elevated zero maze, or acoustic startle/prepulse inhibition. Post-testing, monoamine levels remained decreased in both MA-treated groups in all three brain regions, but were not as large as those observed at 72-h post-treatment. The data demonstrate that MA-induced learning deficits can be dissociated from drug-induced increases in plasma corticosterone or hyperthermia, but co-occur with dopamine and serotonin reductions.

Citing Articles

Effects of intrastriatal dopamine D1 or D2 antagonists on methamphetamine-induced egocentric and allocentric learning and memory deficits in Sprague-Dawley rats.

Gutierrez A, Regan S, Hoover C, Williams M, Vorhees C Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2019; 236(7):2243-2258.

PMID: 30919007 PMC: 6626678. DOI: 10.1007/s00213-019-05221-3.


A Single High Dose of Methamphetamine Reduces Monoamines and Impairs Egocentric and Allocentric Learning and Memory in Adult Male Rats.

Gutierrez A, Williams M, Vorhees C Neurotox Res. 2018; 33(3):671-680.

PMID: 29427284 PMC: 5874175. DOI: 10.1007/s12640-018-9871-9.


Cincinnati water maze: A review of the development, methods, and evidence as a test of egocentric learning and memory.

Vorhees C, Williams M Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2016; 57:1-19.

PMID: 27545092 PMC: 5056837. DOI: 10.1016/j.ntt.2016.08.002.


The role of the GABA system in amphetamine-type stimulant use disorders.

Jiao D, Liu Y, Li X, Liu J, Zhao M Front Cell Neurosci. 2015; 9:162.

PMID: 25999814 PMC: 4419710. DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2015.00162.


Long-term effects of exposure to methamphetamine in adolescent rats.

Ye T, Pozos H, Phillips T, Izquierdo A Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014; 138():17-23.

PMID: 24629630 PMC: 4066881. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.02.021.


References
1.
Sousa N, Lukoyanov N, Madeira M, Almeida O, Paula-Barbosa M . Reorganization of the morphology of hippocampal neurites and synapses after stress-induced damage correlates with behavioral improvement. Neuroscience. 2000; 97(2):253-66. DOI: 10.1016/s0306-4522(00)00050-6. View

2.
Whishaw I, McKenna J, Maaswinkel H . Hippocampal lesions and path integration. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1997; 7(2):228-34. DOI: 10.1016/s0959-4388(97)80011-6. View

3.
Marshall J, Belcher A, Feinstein E, ODell S . Methamphetamine-induced neural and cognitive changes in rodents. Addiction. 2007; 102 Suppl 1:61-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01780.x. View

4.
Fuller R . The involvement of serotonin in regulation of pituitary-adrenocortical function. Front Neuroendocrinol. 1992; 13(3):250-70. View

5.
Cappon G, Morford L, Vorhees C . Ontogeny of methamphetamine-induced neurotoxicity and associated hyperthermic response. Brain Res Dev Brain Res. 1998; 103(2):155-62. DOI: 10.1016/s0165-3806(97)81791-9. View