» Articles » PMID: 20696062

Impact of RNA Degradation on Gene Expression Profiling

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Genetics
Date 2010 Aug 11
PMID 20696062
Citations 102
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Gene expression profiling is a highly sensitive technique which is used for profiling tumor samples for medical prognosis. RNA quality and degradation influence the analysis results of gene expression profiles. The impact of this influence on the profiles and its medical impact is not fully understood. As patient samples are very valuable for clinical studies, it is necessary to establish criteria for the RNA quality to be able to use these samples in later analysis.

Methods: To investigate the effects of RNA integrity on gene expression profiling, whole genome expression arrays were used. We used tumor biopsies from patients diagnosed with locally advanced rectal cancer. To simulate degradation, the isolated total RNA of all patients was subjected to heat-induced degradation in a time-dependent manner. Expression profiling was then performed and data were analyzed bioinformatically to assess the differences.

Results: The differences introduced by RNA degradation were largely outweighed by the biological differences between the patients. Only a relatively small number of probes (275 out of 41,000) show a significant effect due to degradation. The genes that show the strongest effect due to RNA degradation were, especially, those with short mRNAs and probe positions near the 5' end.

Conclusions: Degraded RNA from tumor samples (RIN > 5) can still be used to perform gene expression analysis. A much higher biological variance between patients is observed compared to the effect that is imposed by degradation of RNA. Nevertheless there are genes, very short ones and those with the probe binding side close to the 5' end that should be excluded from gene expression analysis when working with degraded RNA. These results are limited to the Agilent 44 k microarray platform and should be carefully interpreted when transferring to other settings.

Citing Articles

RNAscope Multiplex FISH Signal Assessment in FFPE and Fresh Frozen Tissues: The Effect of Archival Duration on RNA Expression.

Sari A, Copeland K, Nuwongsri P, Pipatsakulroj W, Jinawath A, Israsena N J Histochem Cytochem. 2025; 73(1-2):9-28.

PMID: 39844680 PMC: 11755420. DOI: 10.1369/00221554241311971.


Isolating high-quality RNA for RNA-Seq from 10-year-old blood samples.

Portelli C, Seria E, Attard R, Barzine M, Esquinas-Roman E, Borg Carbott F Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):30716.

PMID: 39730418 PMC: 11681174. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-80287-4.


Your Blood is Out for Delivery: Considerations of Shipping Time and Temperature on Degradation of RNA from Stabilized Whole Blood.

Stefanovic F, Brown L, MacDonald J, Bammler T, Rinchai D, Nguyen S bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39229214 PMC: 11370555. DOI: 10.1101/2024.08.24.609519.


A narrative review of wastewater surveillance: pathogens of concern, applications, detection methods, and challenges.

Singh S, Ismail Ahmed A, Almansoori S, Alameri S, Adlan A, Odivilas G Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1445961.

PMID: 39139672 PMC: 11319304. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1445961.


Integrity assay for messenger RNA in mouse and human brain samples and synaptosomal preparations.

Bujanauskiene D, Merkevicius K, Kuliesiute U, Denkovskij J, Kutanovas S, Luksys G iScience. 2024; 27(8):110419.

PMID: 39108710 PMC: 11301070. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.110419.


References
1.
Popova T, Mennerich D, Weith A, Quast K . Effect of RNA quality on transcript intensity levels in microarray analysis of human post-mortem brain tissues. BMC Genomics. 2008; 9:91. PMC: 2268927. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-91. View

2.
J van t Veer L, Dai H, van de Vijver M, He Y, Hart A, Mao M . Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer. Nature. 2002; 415(6871):530-6. DOI: 10.1038/415530a. View

3.
Jochumsen K, Tan Q, Dahlgaard J, Kruse T, Mogensen O . RNA quality and gene expression analysis of ovarian tumor tissue undergoing repeated thaw-freezing. Exp Mol Pathol. 2006; 82(1):95-102. DOI: 10.1016/j.yexmp.2006.05.004. View

4.
Mutter G, Zahrieh D, Liu C, Neuberg D, Finkelstein D, Baker H . Comparison of frozen and RNALater solid tissue storage methods for use in RNA expression microarrays. BMC Genomics. 2004; 5:88. PMC: 534099. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-5-88. View

5.
Gentleman R, Carey V, Bates D, Bolstad B, Dettling M, Dudoit S . Bioconductor: open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics. Genome Biol. 2004; 5(10):R80. PMC: 545600. DOI: 10.1186/gb-2004-5-10-r80. View