» Articles » PMID: 2069137

Correlation Between Visual Clues, Objective Architectural Features, and Interobserver Agreement in Prostate Cancer

Overview
Specialty Pathology
Date 1991 Jul 1
PMID 2069137
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Three pathologists evaluated a number of designated architectural features to assign grades to 41 cases of well- to moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma, and their opinions were compared. The consensus opinion was obtained and evaluated against objective measurements of glandular architecture that were obtained by morphometric techniques. The observers agreed on gland size, gland uniformity, and the number of glands per field in only 49%, 31%, and 39% of cases, respectively. There were significant differences in the Gleason grades assigned by observers. Paired matching of individual Gleason grades showed agreement among observers in 44% (18 of 41), 56% (23 of 41), and 75% (31 of 41) of cases, respectively. This level of interobserver disagreement occurred even though cases with predominant patterns were selected carefully and those with variable patterns were excluded. A direct relationship appears to exist between increasing Gleason grade and increasing glandular variability, and there is an inverse relationship between Gleason grade, gland lumen area, and the number of glandular nuclei, as assessed by a group of pathologists.

Citing Articles

Label Distribution Learning for Automatic Cancer Grading of Histopathological Images of Prostate Cancer.

Nishio M, Matsuo H, Kurata Y, Sugiyama O, Fujimoto K Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(5).

PMID: 36900325 PMC: 10000939. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15051535.


Circulating blood miRNAs for prostate cancer risk stratification: miRroring the underlying tumor biology with liquid biopsies.

Hoey C, Liu S Res Rep Urol. 2019; 11:29-42.

PMID: 30881943 PMC: 6398395. DOI: 10.2147/RRU.S165625.


Subspecialty surgical pathologist's performances as triage pathologists on a telepathology-enabled quality assurance surgical pathology service: A human factors study.

Braunhut B, Graham A, Lian F, Webster P, Krupinski E, Bhattacharyya A J Pathol Inform. 2014; 5(1):18.

PMID: 25057432 PMC: 4060405. DOI: 10.4103/2153-3539.133142.


Differences in Upgrading of Prostate Cancer in Prostatectomies between Community and Academic Practices.

Lee F, Gottsch H, Ellis W, True L, Lin D, Wright J Adv Urol. 2013; 2013:471234.

PMID: 24260032 PMC: 3821894. DOI: 10.1155/2013/471234.


Gleason scoring at a comprehensive cancer center: what's the difference?.

Townsend N, Ruth K, Al-Saleem T, Horwitz E, Sobczak M, Uzzo R J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2013; 11(7):812-9.

PMID: 23847218 PMC: 3894783. DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2013.0102.