» Articles » PMID: 20690018

Surgical Approaches to Epicardial Pacemaker Placement: Does Pocket Location Affect Lead Survival?

Overview
Journal Pediatr Cardiol
Date 2010 Aug 7
PMID 20690018
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Permanent cardiac pacing in pediatric patients presents challenges related to small patient size, complex anatomy, electrophysiologic abnormalities, and limited access to cardiac chambers. Epicardial pacing currently remains the conventional technique for infants and patients with complex congenital heart disease. Pacemaker lead failure is the major source of failure for such epicardial systems. The authors hypothesized that a retrocostal surgical approach would reduce the rate of lead failure due to fracture compared with the more traditional subrectus and subxiphoid approaches. To evaluate this hypothesis, a retrospective chart review analyzed patients with epicardial pacemaker systems implanted or followed at Rady Children's Hospital San Diego between January 1980 and May 2007. The study cohort consisted of 219 patients and a total of 620 leads with epicardial pacemakers. Among these patients, 84% had structural congenital heart disease, and 45% were younger than 3 years at time of the first implantation. The estimated lead survival was 93% at 2 years and 83% at 5 years. The majority of leads failed due to pacing problems (54%), followed by lead fracture (31%) and sensing problems (14%). When lead failure was adjusted for length of follow-up period, no significant differences in the rates of failure by pocket location were found.

Citing Articles

Ischemic Heart Disease with In-Stent Re-Stenosis with Complete Heart Block and Isolated Persistent Left Superior Vena Cava - Rare Case Report with Challenges and Clinical Implications.

Yedurupaka S, Raj B, Prasad R Ann Card Anaesth. 2024; 27(3):270-273.

PMID: 38963367 PMC: 11315249. DOI: 10.4103/aca.aca_166_23.


Biventricular ICD Placement Percutaneously Via the Iliac Vein: Case Reports and a Review.

Higgins S J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2020; 8(7):2784-2789.

PMID: 32494460 PMC: 7252926. DOI: 10.19102/icrm.2017.080702.


Intraoperative localization of cardiac conduction tissue regions using real-time fibre-optic confocal microscopy: first in human trial.

Kaza A, Mondal A, Piekarski B, Sachse F, Hitchcock R Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020; 58(2):261-268.

PMID: 32083653 PMC: 7594189. DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezaa040.


Old but not forgotten: Creative use of abandoned epicardial leads after more than 2 decades.

Bjorkman K, Clancy J, Elder R HeartRhythm Case Rep. 2018; 3(12):559-561.

PMID: 29296574 PMC: 5741798. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrcr.2017.05.006.


Minimally Invasive Epicardial Pacemaker Implantation in Neonates with Congenital Heart Block.

Costa R, Silva K, Martinelli Filho M, Carrillo R Arq Bras Cardiol. 2017; 109(4):331-339.

PMID: 28876373 PMC: 5644213. DOI: 10.5935/abc.20170126.


References
1.
Thomson J, Blackburn M, Van Doorn C, Nicholls A, Watterson K . Pacing activity, patient and lead survival over 20 years of permanent epicardial pacing in children. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004; 77(4):1366-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2003.08.057. View

2.
Warner K, Halpin D, Berul C, PAYNE D . Placement of a permanent epicardial pacemaker in children using a subcostal approach. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999; 68(1):173-5. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(99)00399-9. View

3.
Fortescue E, Berul C, Cecchin F, Walsh E, Triedman J, Alexander M . Patient, procedural, and hardware factors associated with pacemaker lead failures in pediatrics and congenital heart disease. Heart Rhythm. 2005; 1(2):150-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2004.02.020. View

4.
Silvetti M, Drago F, Grutter G, De Santis A, Di Ciommo V, Rava L . Twenty years of paediatric cardiac pacing: 515 pacemakers and 480 leads implanted in 292 patients. Europace. 2006; 8(7):530-6. DOI: 10.1093/europace/eul062. View

5.
Maginot , Mathewson , Bichell , Perry . Applications of pacing strategies in neonates and infants. Prog Pediatr Cardiol. 2000; 11(1):65-75. DOI: 10.1016/s1058-9813(00)00037-0. View