» Articles » PMID: 20689927

Reorganising the Pandemic Triage Processes to Ethically Maximise Individuals' Best Interests

Overview
Specialty Critical Care
Date 2010 Aug 7
PMID 20689927
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To provide a revised definition, process and purpose of triage to maximise the number of patients receiving intensive care during a crisis.

Methods: Based on the ethical principle of virtue ethics and the underlying goal of providing individual patients with treatment according to their best interests, the methodology of triage is reassessed and revised.

Results: The decision making processes regarding treatment decisions during a pandemic are redefined and new methods of intensive care provision recommended as well as recommending the use of a 'ranking' system for patients excluded from intensive care, defining the role of non-intensive care specialists, and applying two types of triage as 'organisational triage' and 'treatment triage' based on the demand for intensive care.

Conclusion: Using a different underlying ethical basis upon which to plan for a pandemic crisis could maximise the number of patients receiving intensive care based on individual patients' best interests.

Citing Articles

Allocation of intensive care resources during an infectious disease outbreak: a rapid review to inform practice.

Fiest K, Krewulak K, Plotnikoff K, Kemp L, Parhar K, Niven D BMC Med. 2020; 18(1):404.

PMID: 33334347 PMC: 7746486. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-020-01871-9.


The Simple Triage Scoring System (STSS) successfully predicts mortality and critical care resource utilization in H1N1 pandemic flu: a retrospective analysis.

Adeniji K, Cusack R Crit Care. 2011; 15(1):R39.

PMID: 21269458 PMC: 3221968. DOI: 10.1186/cc10001.


Year in review in Intensive Care Medicine 2010: II. Pneumonia and infections, cardiovascular and haemodynamics, organization, education, haematology, nutrition, ethics and miscellanea.

Antonelli M, Azoulay E, Bonten M, Chastre J, Citerio G, Conti G Intensive Care Med. 2011; 37(2):196-213.

PMID: 21225240 PMC: 3029678. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-010-2123-y.

References
1.
Miller M, Viboud C, Balinska M, Simonsen L . The signature features of influenza pandemics--implications for policy. N Engl J Med. 2009; 360(25):2595-8. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp0903906. View

2.
Schuetz P, Koller M, Christ-Crain M, Steyerberg E, Stolz D, Muller C . Predicting mortality with pneumonia severity scores: importance of model recalibration to local settings. Epidemiol Infect. 2008; 136(12):1628-37. PMC: 2870789. DOI: 10.1017/S0950268808000435. View

3.
Nguyen H, Rivers E, Havstad S, Knoblich B, Ressler J, Muzzin A . Critical care in the emergency department: A physiologic assessment and outcome evaluation. Acad Emerg Med. 2000; 7(12):1354-61. DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2000.tb00492.x. View

4.
Shelton W . Can virtue be taught?. Acad Med. 1999; 74(6):671-4. DOI: 10.1097/00001888-199906000-00013. View

5.
Sinuff T, Adhikari N, Cook D, Schunemann H, Griffith L, Rocker G . Mortality predictions in the intensive care unit: comparing physicians with scoring systems. Crit Care Med. 2006; 34(3):878-85. DOI: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000201881.58644.41. View