» Articles » PMID: 20687081

Antibiotic Therapy for Shigella Dysentery

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Date 2010 Aug 6
PMID 20687081
Citations 38
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Shigella dysentery is a relatively common illness and occasionally causes death, worldwide. Mild symptoms are self-limiting but in more severe cases, antibiotics are recommended for cure and preventing relapse. The antibiotics recommended are diverse, have regional differences in sensitivity, and have side effects.

Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of antibiotics for treating Shigella dysentery.

Search Strategy: In June 2009 we identified all relevant trials from the following databases: Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group Specialized Register; Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2008, issue 4), MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS and the metaRegister of Controlled Trials (mRCT). We also checked conference proceedings for relevant abstracts, and contacted researchers, organizations, and pharmaceutical companies.

Selection Criteria: Randomized controlled trials of antibiotics for Shigella dysentery.

Data Collection And Analysis: Four authors, working in pairs, independently assessed trial eligibility, methodological quality, and extracted data. We calculated risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dichotomous data, and used the random-effects model for significant heterogeneity. We explored possible sources of heterogeneity, when present, in subgroup analyses of participant age and percentage of participants with confirmed Shigella infection.

Main Results: Sixteen trials (1748 participants), spanning four decades and with differing sensitivity to Shigella isolates, met the inclusion criteria. Seven were judged to be at risk of bias due to inadequate allocation concealment or blinding, and 12 due to incomplete reporting of outcome data. Limited data from one three-armed trial of people with moderately severe illness suggest that antibiotics reduce the episodes of diarrhoea at follow-up (furazolidone versus no drug RR 0.21, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.48, 73 participants; cotrimoxazole versus no drug RR 0.30, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.59, 76 participants).There was insufficient evidence to consider any class of antibiotic superior in efficacy in treating Shigella dysentery, but heterogeneity for some comparisons limits confidence in the results. All the antibiotics studied were safe. There was inadequate evidence regarding the role of antibiotics in preventing relapses.

Authors' Conclusions: Antibiotics reduce the duration of Shigella dysentery.Regularly updated local or regional antibiotic sensitivity patterns to different species and strains of Shigella are required to guide empiric therapy. More trials adhering to standard guidelines are required to evaluate the role of antibiotics in the treatment of severe forms of Shigella dysentery and in groups who are at high risk of complications.

Citing Articles

Antibiotics for acute watery or persistent with or without bloody diarrhoea in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Naqvi S, Bin Ali Zubairi M, Ali A, Sharif A, Salam R, Hasnain Z J Glob Health. 2024; 14():04211.

PMID: 39641317 PMC: 11622352. DOI: 10.7189/jogh.14.04211.


Resistome phylodynamics of multidrug-resistant isolated from diarrheal patients.

Asad A, Nayeem M, Mostafa M, Begum R, Faruque S, Nusrin S Microbiol Spectr. 2024; 13(1):e0163524.

PMID: 39612215 PMC: 11705805. DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.01635-24.


Antibiotic use prior to attending a large diarrheal disease hospital among preschool children suffering from bloody or non-bloody diarrhea: A cross-sectional study conducted in Bangladesh.

Bashar S, Islam M, Nuzhat S, Amin R, Rahman M, Pavlinac P PLoS One. 2024; 19(11):e0314325.

PMID: 39591443 PMC: 11593761. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314325.


The Impact of Non-Dysentery Shigella Infection on the Growth and Health of Children over Time (INSIGHT)-A Prospective Case-Control Study Protocol.

Chakraborty S, Dash S, Antara N, Roy B, Mamun S, Ali M Microorganisms. 2024; 12(8).

PMID: 39203519 PMC: 11356629. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms12081677.


Evaluation of Fecal Inflammatory Biomarkers to Identify Bacterial Diarrhea Episodes: Systematic Review and Protocol for the Enterics for Global Health Surveillance Study.

Babb C, Badji H, Bhuiyan M, Cornick J, Qureshi S, Sonye C Open Forum Infect Dis. 2024; 11(Suppl 1):S65-S75.

PMID: 38532957 PMC: 10962755. DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofad652.


References
1.
Gilman R, Koster F, Islam S, McLaughlin J, Rahaman M . Randomized trial of high- and low-dose ampicillin therapy for treatment of severe dysentery due to Shigella dysenteriae type 1. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1980; 17(3):402-5. PMC: 283799. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.17.3.402. View

2.
Vinh H, Wain J, Chinh M, Tam C, Trang P, Nga D . Treatment of bacillary dysentery in Vietnamese children: two doses of ofloxacin versus 5-days nalidixic acid. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2000; 94(3):323-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0035-9203(00)90343-2. View

3.
HALTALIN K, Nelson J, Ring 3rd R, Sladoje M, Hinton L . Double-blind treatment study of shigellosis comparing ampicillin, sulfadiazine, and placebo. J Pediatr. 1967; 70(6):970-81. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3476(67)80275-0. View

4.
Kotloff K, Winickoff J, Ivanoff B, Clemens J, Swerdlow D, Sansonetti P . Global burden of Shigella infections: implications for vaccine development and implementation of control strategies. Bull World Health Organ. 1999; 77(8):651-66. PMC: 2557719. View

5.
Aoki T, Shimizu N, Tomizawa I, Takizawa Y, Matsubara Y, Nitta Y . [Comparison of clinical efficacy of lomefloxacin (LFLX, NY-198) and pipemidic acid (PPA) in the treatment of infectious enteritis by a double-blind method. The Japan Research Committee of Lomefloxacin Research Group Enteritis]. Kansenshogaku Zasshi. 1989; 63(6):606-22. DOI: 10.11150/kansenshogakuzasshi1970.63.606. View