» Articles » PMID: 20677896

From Sunshine to Double Arrows: an Evaluation Window Account of Negative Compatibility Effects

Overview
Specialty Psychology
Date 2010 Aug 4
PMID 20677896
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In category priming, target stimuli are to be sorted into 2 categories. Prime stimuli preceding targets typically facilitate processing of targets when primes and targets are members of the same category, relative to the case in which both stem from different categories, a positive compatibility effect (PCE). But negative compatibility effects (NCEs) are also sometimes observed. An evaluation window account (Klauer, Teige-Mocigemba, & Spruyt, 2009) of PCE and NCE in evaluative priming (category good versus category bad) is applied to masked arrow priming (Eimer & Schlaghecken, 1998; category left versus category right). Key principles of the account are that participants evaluate incoming evidence across a time window, and decisions about stimulus category are driven by changes in evidence weighted according to the Weber-Fechner law, leading to NCE for primes falling outside the time window and PCE for primes inside the time window. In Experiments 1-4, factors considered obligatory for NCE by current accounts of arrow priming are successively removed; yet, NCE remained intact as predicted by the evaluation window account. Furthermore, the evaluation window account, but none of the current accounts, predicts NCE without a stimulus intervening between prime and target at intermediate prime-target stimulus-onset asynchrony (Experiment 5) and when target onset comes as a surprise (Experiment 6). We conclude that the evaluation window account describes a hitherto overlooked mechanism that contributes to PCE and NCE in arrow priming and that it appears to generalize beyond the confines of evaluative priming to the diverse class of category-priming paradigms.

Citing Articles

Degree and Complexity of Non-conscious Emotional Information Processing - A Review of Masked Priming Studies.

Rohr M, Wentura D Front Hum Neurosci. 2021; 15:689369.

PMID: 34239432 PMC: 8258119. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.689369.


A neural habituation account of the negative compatibility effect.

Jacob L, Potter K, Huber D J Exp Psychol Gen. 2021; 150(12):2567-2590.

PMID: 34014754 PMC: 8605039. DOI: 10.1037/xge0001055.


Response Priming with Horizontally and Vertically Moving Primes: A Comparison of German, Malaysian, and Japanese Subjects.

Bermeitinger C, Kalbfleisch L, Schafer K, Lim A, Goymann H, Reuter L Adv Cogn Psychol. 2020; 16(2):131-149.

PMID: 32665804 PMC: 7341111. DOI: 10.5709/acp-0291-y.


Sustained Visual Priming Effects Can Emerge from Attentional Oscillation and Temporal Expectation.

Wang M, Huang Y, Luo H, Zhang H J Neurosci. 2020; 40(18):3657-3674.

PMID: 32253359 PMC: 7189757. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2539-19.2020.


Get Set or Get Distracted? Disentangling Content-Priming and Attention-Catching Effects of Background Lure Stimuli on Identifying Targets in Two Simultaneously Presented Series.

Verleger R, Smigasiewicz K, Michael L, Heikaus L, Niedeggen M Brain Sci. 2019; 9(12).

PMID: 31835694 PMC: 6955916. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci9120365.