» Articles » PMID: 20676666

The Impact of Pulmonary Disease on Noninvasive Measurement of Cardiac Output by the Inert Gas Rebreathing Method

Overview
Journal Lung
Specialty Pulmonary Medicine
Date 2010 Aug 3
PMID 20676666
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Cardiac output (CO) is an important parameter for diagnosis and therapy of heart diseases, but it is still difficult to determine. Innocor, a novel noninvasive inert gas rebreathing (IGR) system, has shown promising results. However, the impact of pulmonary diseases on IGR remains unclear. The aim of the study therefore was to assess the accuracy and reliability of IGR in patients with distinct chronic lung disease. A total of 96 patients were enrolled, including 48 consecutive patients with variant lung diseases (group A) and 48 pair-matched pulmonary healthy patients (group B). CO was measured with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) and IGR. Lung function testing was done by spirometry [FEV(1)/FVC (forced expiratory volume in one second/forced vital capacity), VC (vital capacity)] and determination of the diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide divided by alveolar volume (DLCO/VA). In group A we found a mean CO of 4.7 ± 1.3 L/min by IGR and 4.9 ± 1.2 L/min by CMR. Group B showed a mean CO of 4.8 ± 1.4 L/min by IGR and 5.0 ± 1.3 L/min by CMR. Bland-Altman analysis revealed good correspondence between CMR and IGR, with an average deviation of 0.1 ± 1.0 L/min in group A and 0.1 ± 1.0 L/min in group B (p = 0.99). Multiple regression analysis for the pulmonary parameters did not show a statistically significant impact on the mean bias of CO measurements (FEV(1)/FVC: r = 0.01, p = 0.91; VC: r = -0.2, p = 0.13; and DLCO/VA: r = 0.04, p = 0.82). IGR allows a feasible determination of CO even in patients with lung diseases. The accuracy of the IGR method is not influenced by either pulmonary obstructive and restrictive diseases or a reduced DLCO.

Citing Articles

The prognostic ability of cardiac output determined by inert gas rebreathing technique in pulmonary hypertension.

Robertson L, Bunclark K, Ross R, Cannon J, Sheares K, Taboada D Chron Respir Dis. 2022; 19:14799731221078473.

PMID: 35184583 PMC: 8864257. DOI: 10.1177/14799731221078473.


Non-invasive measurement of hemodynamic response to postural stress using inert gas rebreathing.

Stach K, Michels J, Doesch C, Brade J, Papavassiliu T, Borggrefe M Biomed Rep. 2019; 11(3):98-102.

PMID: 31423303 PMC: 6684938. DOI: 10.3892/br.2019.1229.


Impaired central hemodynamics in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease during submaximal exercise.

Smith J, Johnson B, Olson T J Appl Physiol (1985). 2019; 127(3):691-697.

PMID: 31295068 PMC: 6766712. DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00877.2018.


Evaluation of inert gas rebreathing for determination of cardiac output: influence of age, gender and body size.

Middlemiss J, Cocks A, Paapstel K, Maki-Petaja K, Sunita , Wilkinson I Hypertens Res. 2018; 42(6):834-844.

PMID: 30560890 PMC: 8076049. DOI: 10.1038/s41440-018-0179-1.


Exercise Stroke Volume in Adult Cystic Fibrosis: A Comparison of Acetylene Pulmonary Uptake and Oxygen Pulse.

Van Iterson E, Baker S, Wheatley C, Morgan W, Olson T, Snyder E Clin Med Insights Circ Respir Pulm Med. 2018; 12:1179548418790564.

PMID: 30083061 PMC: 6073827. DOI: 10.1177/1179548418790564.


References
1.
Bland J, Altman D . Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986; 1(8476):307-10. View

2.
Fontana P, Boutellier U, Toigo M . Reliability of measurements with Innocor during exercise. Int J Sports Med. 2009; 30(10):747-53. DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1225340. View

3.
Kaukinen S, Koobi T, Bi Y, Turjanmaa V . Cardiac output measurement after coronary artery bypass grafting using bolus thermodilution, continuous thermodilution, and whole-body impedance cardiography. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2003; 17(2):199-203. DOI: 10.1053/jcan.2003.47. View

4.
Dressel H, Filser L, Fischer R, de la Motte D, Steinhaeusser W, Huber R . Lung diffusing capacity for nitric oxide and carbon monoxide: dependence on breath-hold time. Chest. 2008; 133(5):1149-54. DOI: 10.1378/chest.07-2388. View

5.
Pellegrino R, Viegi G, Brusasco V, Crapo R, Burgos F, Casaburi R . Interpretative strategies for lung function tests. Eur Respir J. 2005; 26(5):948-68. DOI: 10.1183/09031936.05.00035205. View