Varying Ratios of Wavelengths in Dual Wavelength LED Photomodulation Alters Gene Expression Profiles in Human Skin Fibroblasts
Overview
Pharmacology
Affiliations
Background And Objective: LED photomodulation has been shown to profoundly influence cellular behavior. A variety of parameters with LED photomodulation can alter cellular response in vitro. The effects of one visible and one infrared wavelength were evaluated to determine the optimal ratio to produce a net increase in dermal collagen by altering the ratio of total energy output of each wavelength. The ratio between the two wavelengths (590 and 870 nm) was shifted in 25% increments.
Study Design/materials And Methods: Human skin fibroblasts in culture were exposed to a 590/870 nm LED array with total combined energy density fixed at 4.0 mW/cm.. The ratio of 590/870 nm tested parameters were: 100/0%, 75/25%, 50/50%, 25/75%, and 0/100%. These ratios were delivered using pulsed duty cycle of exposure (250 milliseconds "on" time/100 milliseconds "off" time/100 pulses) for a total energy fluence of 0.1 J/cm.. Gene expression was examined using commercially available extra cellular matrix and adhesion molecule RT PCR Arrays (SA Biosciences, Frederick, MD) at 24 hours post-exposure.
Results: Different expression profiles were noticed for each of the ratios studied. Overall, there was an average (in an 80 gene array) of 6% expression difference in up or downregulation between the arrays. The greatest increase in collagen I and decrease in collagenase (MMP-1) was observed with 75/25% ratio of 590/870 nm. The addition of increasing proportions of IR wavelengths causes alteration in gene expression profile. The ratios of the wavelengths caused variation in magnitude of expression.
Conclusions: Cell metabolism and gene expression can be altered by simultaneous exposure to multiple wavelengths of low energy light. Varying the ratios of specific wavelength intensity in both visible and near infrared light therapy can strongly influence resulting fibroblast gene expression patterns.
Borrelli E, Coco G, Pellegrini M, Mura M, Ciarmatori N, Scorcia V Ophthalmol Ther. 2024; 13(11):2855-2868.
PMID: 39271642 PMC: 11494651. DOI: 10.1007/s40123-024-01030-w.
Fantaguzzi F, Tombolini B, Servillo A, Zucchiatti I, Sacconi R, Bandello F Ophthalmol Ther. 2023; 12(6):2903-2915.
PMID: 37768527 PMC: 10640464. DOI: 10.1007/s40123-023-00812-y.
Light-emitting diode phototherapy: pain relief and underlying mechanisms.
Zhang W, Wang X, Chu Y, Wang Y Lasers Med Sci. 2022; 37(5):2343-2352.
PMID: 35404002 DOI: 10.1007/s10103-022-03540-0.
Study on injection molding analysis of glasses-type wearable device for facial skin care.
Shin M, Chong W, Kim K, Yu C Technol Health Care. 2020; 28(S1):473-485.
PMID: 32364180 PMC: 7369105. DOI: 10.3233/THC-209048.
Light-emitting Diodes: A Brief Review and Clinical Experience.
Opel D, Hagstrom E, Pace A, Sisto K, Hirano-Ali S, Desai S J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2015; 8(6):36-44.
PMID: 26155326 PMC: 4479368.