» Articles » PMID: 20650373

The Practice of Seclusion and Time-out on English Acute Psychiatric Wards: the City-128 Study

Overview
Specialties Nursing
Psychiatry
Date 2010 Jul 24
PMID 20650373
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Seclusion is widely used internationally to manage disturbed behavior by psychiatric patients, although many countries are seeking to reduce or eliminate this practice. Time-out has been little described and almost completely unstudied.

Aim And Method: To assess the relationship of seclusion and time-out to conflict behaviors, the use of containment methods, service environment, physical environment, patient routines, staff characteristics, and staff group variables. Data from a multivariate cross-sectional study of 136 acute psychiatric wards in England were used to conduct this analysis.

Results: Seclusion is used infrequently on English acute psychiatric wards (0.05 incidents per day), whereas time-out use was more frequent (0.31 incidents per day). Usage of seclusion was strongly associated with the availability of a seclusion room. Seclusion was associated with aggression, alcohol use, absconding, and medication refusal, whereas time-out was associated with these and other more minor conflict behaviors. Both were associated with the giving of "as required" medication, coerced intramuscular medication, and manual restraint. Relationships with exit security for the ward were also found.

Conclusions: Given its low usage rate, the scope for seclusion reduction in English acute psychiatry may be small. Seclusion reduction initiatives need to take a wider range of factors into account. Some substitution of seclusion with time-out may be possible, but a rigorous trial is required to establish this. The safety of intoxicated patients in seclusion requires more attention.

Citing Articles

Exploring Nurses' and Nursing Students' Attitudes Toward Coercive and Technological Measures in Mental Health: A Conceptual Framework and Study Protocol.

Anastasi G, Latina R, Longobucco Y, Stievano A, Bambi S Nurs Rep. 2024; 14(4):4129-4144.

PMID: 39728662 PMC: 11676972. DOI: 10.3390/nursrep14040301.


Coercion in psychiatry: psychometric validation of the Portuguese Staff Attitudes to Coercion Scale (SACS).

Aluh D, Diaz-Milanes D, Pedrosa B, Silva M, Grigaite U, Almeida C Discov Ment Health. 2024; 4(1):27.

PMID: 39141248 PMC: 11324637. DOI: 10.1007/s44192-024-00083-4.


Offenders and non-offenders with schizophrenia spectrum disorders: the crime-preventive potential of sufficient embedment in the mental healthcare and support system.

Machetanz L, Hofmann A, Mohrke J, Kirchebner J Front Psychiatry. 2023; 14:1231851.

PMID: 37711423 PMC: 10498463. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1231851.


Ethnic disparities in the use of restrictive practices in adult mental health inpatient settings: a scoping review.

Pedersen M, Gildberg F, Baker J, Damsgaard J, Tingleff E Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2022; 58(4):505-522.

PMID: 36454269 PMC: 9713127. DOI: 10.1007/s00127-022-02387-8.


Measuring Staff Attitudes to Coercion in Poland.

Lickiewicz J, Husum T, Ruud T, Siqveland J, Musial Z, Makara-Studzinska M Front Psychiatry. 2021; 12:745215.

PMID: 34867536 PMC: 8635088. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.745215.