» Articles » PMID: 20649686

Effect of a Disease-specific Planning Intervention on Surrogate Understanding of Patient Goals for Future Medical Treatment

Overview
Specialty Geriatrics
Date 2010 Jul 24
PMID 20649686
Citations 51
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To determine whether a disease-specific planning process can improve surrogate understanding of goals of patients with life-limiting illnesses for future medical treatments.

Design: A multisite randomized controlled trial conducted between January 1, 2004 and July 31, 2007.

Setting: Six outpatient clinics of large community or university health systems in three Wisconsin cities.

Participants: Competent, English-speaking adults aged 18 and older with chronic congestive heart failure or chronic renal disease and their surrogate decision-makers.

Intervention: Trained health professionals conducted a structured, patient-centered interview intended to promote informed decision-making and to result in the completion of a document clarifying the goals of the patient with regard to four disease-specific health outcome situations and the degree of decision-making latitude granted to the surrogate.

Measurements: Surrogate understanding of patient goals for care with regard to four expected, disease-specific outcomes situations and of the degree of surrogate latitude in decision-making.

Results: Three hundred thirteen patient-surrogate pairs completed the study. As measured according to kappa scores and in all four situations and in the degree of latitude, intervention group surrogates demonstrated a significantly higher degree of understanding of patient goals than control group surrogates. Intervention group kappa scores ranged from 0.61 to 0.78, whereas control group kappa scores ranged from 0.07 to 0.28.

Conclusion: Surrogates in the intervention group had a significantly better understanding of patient goals and preferences than surrogates in the control group. This finding is the first step toward ensuring that patient goals for care are known and honored.

Citing Articles

Preferences for Advance Care Planning in Patients with End-Stage Kidney Disease: A Cross-Sectional Survey among Nephrology Healthcare Providers in a Tertiary Care Center in India.

Naik B, Ghoshal A, Damani A, Singhai P, Prabhu Attur R, Salins N Nephron. 2024; 149(1):48-56.

PMID: 39250897 PMC: 11731831. DOI: 10.1159/000541347.


Tools for tomorrow: a scoping review of patient-facing tools for advance care planning.

Riley S, Voisin C, Stevens E, Bose-Brill S, Moss K Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2024; 18:26323524241263108.

PMID: 39045292 PMC: 11265253. DOI: 10.1177/26323524241263108.


Evaluation of interactive web-based tools to stimulate reflection and communication about advance care planning with people with dementia and their family caregivers.

Monnet F, Pivodic L, Dupont C, Smets T, De Vleminck A, Van Audenhove C BMC Palliat Care. 2024; 23(1):162.

PMID: 38943119 PMC: 11212172. DOI: 10.1186/s12904-024-01486-4.


A communication intervention to improve prognostic understanding and engagement in advance care planning among diverse advanced cancer patient-caregiver dyads: A pilot study.

Shen M, Prigerson H, Maciejewski P, Daly B, Adelman R, McConnell Trevino K Palliat Support Care. 2023; 22(1):10-18.

PMID: 37526150 PMC: 10901460. DOI: 10.1017/S1478951523000901.


Experiences and perspectives of healthcare professionals implementing advance care planning for people suffering from life-limiting illness: a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies.

Zhu N, Yang L, Wang X, Tuo J, Chen L, Deng R BMC Palliat Care. 2023; 22(1):55.

PMID: 37149560 PMC: 10163819. DOI: 10.1186/s12904-023-01176-7.


References
1.
Schwartz C, Wheeler H, Hammes B, Basque N, Edmunds J, Reed G . Early intervention in planning end-of-life care with ambulatory geriatric patients: results of a pilot trial. Arch Intern Med. 2002; 162(14):1611-8. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.162.14.1611. View

2.
Roberto K . Influence of a values discussion on congruence between elderly women and their families on critical health care decisions. J Women Aging. 1997; 9(4):5-22. DOI: 10.1300/J074v09n04_02. View

3.
Briggs L . Shifting the focus of advance care planning: using an in-depth interview to build and strengthen relationships. J Palliat Med. 2004; 7(2):341-9. DOI: 10.1089/109662104773709503. View

4.
Marbella A, Desbiens N, Layde P . Surrogates' agreement with patients' resuscitation preferences: effect of age, relationship, and SUPPORT intervention. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment. J Crit Care. 1998; 13(3):140-5. DOI: 10.1016/s0883-9441(98)90018-1. View

5.
Lyon M, Garvie P, McCarter R, Briggs L, He J, DAngelo L . Who will speak for me? Improving end-of-life decision-making for adolescents with HIV and their families. Pediatrics. 2009; 123(2):e199-206. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2008-2379. View