» Articles » PMID: 20647575

A Cluster-randomized Effectiveness Trial of a Physician-pharmacist Collaborative Model to Improve Blood Pressure Control

Overview
Date 2010 Jul 22
PMID 20647575
Citations 29
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Unlabelled: Numerous studies have demonstrated the value of team-based care to improve blood pressure (BP) control, but there is limited information on whether these models would be adopted in diverse populations. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether a collaborative model between physicians and pharmacists can improve BP control in multiple primary care medical offices with diverse geographic and patient characteristics and whether long-term BP control can be sustained. This study is a randomized prospective trial in 27 primary care offices first stratified by the percentage of underrepresented minorities and the level of clinical pharmacy services within the office. Each office is then randomized to either a 9- or 24-month intervention or a control group. Patients will be enrolled in this study until 2012. The results of this study should provide information on whether this model can be implemented in large numbers of diverse offices, if it is effective in diverse populations, and whether BP control can be sustained long term.

Clinical Trial Registration: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00935077.

Citing Articles

Education programmes for people with chronic kidney disease and diabetes.

Cashmore B, Cooper T, Evangelidis N, Green S, Lopez-Vargas P, Tunnicliffe D Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024; 8:CD007374.

PMID: 39171639 PMC: 11339929. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007374.pub3.


A cluster randomized trial to evaluate a centralized remote clinical pharmacy service in large, health system primary care clinics.

Kennelty K, Coffey C, Ardery G, Uribe L, Yankey J, Ecklund D J Am Coll Clin Pharm. 2023; 4(10):1287-1299.

PMID: 37265855 PMC: 10234512. DOI: 10.1002/jac5.1497.


The cost-effectiveness of pharmacist-physician collaborative care models vs usual care on time in target systolic blood pressure range in patients with hypertension: a payer perspective.

Jay J, Ijioma S, Holdford D, Dixon D, Sisson E, Patterson J J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021; 27(12):1680-1690.

PMID: 34818090 PMC: 10390951. DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.12.1680.


Dissemination of a telehealth cardiovascular risk service: The CVRS live protocol.

Kennelty K, Engblom N, Carter B, Hollingworth L, Levy B, Finkelstein R Contemp Clin Trials. 2021; 102:106282.

PMID: 33444781 PMC: 8627195. DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106282.


A pharmacist intervention for monitoring and treating hypertension using bidirectional texting: PharmText BP.

Polgreen L, Carter B, Polgreen P, Snyder P, Sewell D, Bayman E Contemp Clin Trials. 2020; 98:106169.

PMID: 33038500 PMC: 7686143. DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2020.106169.


References
1.
Milchak J, Carter B, Ardery G, Dawson J, Harmston M, Franciscus C . Physician adherence to blood pressure guidelines and its effect on seniors. Pharmacotherapy. 2008; 28(7):843-51. DOI: 10.1592/phco.28.7.843. View

2.
Berlowitz D, Ash A, HICKEY E, Friedman R, Glickman M, Kader B . Inadequate management of blood pressure in a hypertensive population. N Engl J Med. 1998; 339(27):1957-63. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199812313392701. View

3.
. Major outcomes in high-risk hypertensive patients randomized to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or calcium channel blocker vs diuretic: The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT). JAMA. 2002; 288(23):2981-97. DOI: 10.1001/jama.288.23.2981. View

4.
Milchak J, Carter B, James P, Ardery G . Measuring adherence to practice guidelines for the management of hypertension: an evaluation of the literature. Hypertension. 2004; 44(5):602-8. PMC: 1414061. DOI: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000144100.29945.5e. View

5.
Dickerson L, Kraus C, Kuo G, Weber C, Bazaldua O, Tovar J . Formation of a primary care pharmacist practice-based research network. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2007; 64(19):2044-9. DOI: 10.2146/ajhp060650. View