» Articles » PMID: 20645028

Distribution of Some Activating KRAS and BRAF Mutations in Slovene Patients with Colorectal Cancer

Overview
Journal Med Oncol
Publisher Springer
Specialty Oncology
Date 2010 Jul 21
PMID 20645028
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Numerous clinical studies have shown that anti-EGFR therapies are effective only in a subset of patients with colorectal cancer. Even though mutations in the KRAS gene have been confirmed as negative predictors of the response to EGFR-targeted therapies, not all KRAS wild-type (wt-KRAS) patients will respond to treatment. Recent studies have demonstrated that additionally wild-type BRAF (wt-BRAF) genotype is required for response to panitumumab or cetuximab, suggesting that BRAF genotype criteria should be used together with KRAS genotype for selecting the patients who are about to benefit from the anti-EGFR therapy. In this study, 239 samples obtained from 215 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer were tested for the presence of the seven most common mutations in the KRAS gene and the V600E mutation in the BRAF gene. Among the tested patients, 53.8% of patients had wt-KRAS genotype and 46.2% were KRAS mutants. Around five percent (5.1%) of the tested patients bore the V600E mutation in BRAF gene. All the patients showing to have the V600E mutation in BRAF were wt-KRAS. The concordance of KRAS and BRAF mutational status between primary and metastatic tumor tissue samples was 100%. We have shown that the proportions of mutated and non-mutated KRAS in Slovene patients, as well as the proportion of V600E mutations in BRAF is similar to genotyping results reported by other authors. The tested seven KRAS mutations on codons 12 and 13 were mutually exclusive with the V600E mutation in the BRAF gene. Summing up the results about the KRAS and the BRAF mutation carriers from our study, the portion of potentially non-responsive patients for the anti-EGFR treatment is 51.3%.

Citing Articles

The five-year KRAS, NRAS and BRAF analysis results and treatment patterns in daily clinical practice in Slovenia in 1 line treatment of metastatic colorectal (mCRC) patients with wild-type tumour (wt) - a real- life data report 2013-2018.

Mesti T, Rebersek M, Ocvirk J Radiol Oncol. 2023; 57(1):103-110.

PMID: 36942906 PMC: 10039470. DOI: 10.2478/raon-2023-0014.


Transcriptomic heterogeneity of driver gene mutations reveals novel mutual exclusivity and improves exploration of functional associations.

Lan Y, Liu W, Zhang W, Hu J, Zhu X, Wan L Cancer Med. 2021; 10(14):4977-4993.

PMID: 34076361 PMC: 8290236. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4039.


Detection of Somatic Mutations with ddPCR from Liquid Biopsy of Colorectal Cancer Patients.

Prosenc Zmrzljak U, Kosir R, Krivokapic Z, Radojkovic D, Nikolic A Genes (Basel). 2021; 12(2).

PMID: 33669856 PMC: 7923234. DOI: 10.3390/genes12020289.


Molecular biomarkers and histological parameters impact on survival and response to first- line systemic therapy of metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

Rebersek M, Mesti T, Boc M, Ocvirk J Radiol Oncol. 2019; 53(1):85-95.

PMID: 30840593 PMC: 6411021. DOI: 10.2478/raon-2019-0013.


Primary tumor resection in stage IV unresectable colorectal cancer: what has changed?.

Pedziwiatr M, Mizera M, Witowski J, Major P, Torbicz G, Gajewska N Med Oncol. 2017; 34(12):188.

PMID: 29086041 PMC: 5662673. DOI: 10.1007/s12032-017-1047-6.


References
1.
Bardelli A, Siena S . Molecular mechanisms of resistance to cetuximab and panitumumab in colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010; 28(7):1254-61. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2009.24.6116. View

2.
Gnanasampanthan G, Elsaleh H, McCaul K, Iacopetta B . Ki-ras mutation type and the survival benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in Dukes' C colorectal cancer. J Pathol. 2001; 195(5):543-8. DOI: 10.1002/path.990. View

3.
Spano J, Lagorce C, Atlan D, Milano G, Domont J, Benamouzig R . Impact of EGFR expression on colorectal cancer patient prognosis and survival. Ann Oncol. 2004; 16(1):102-8. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdi006. View

4.
Amado R, Wolf M, Peeters M, Van Cutsem E, Siena S, Freeman D . Wild-type KRAS is required for panitumumab efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008; 26(10):1626-34. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.7116. View

5.
Santini D, Loupakis F, Vincenzi B, Floriani I, Stasi I, Canestrari E . High concordance of KRAS status between primary colorectal tumors and related metastatic sites: implications for clinical practice. Oncologist. 2008; 13(12):1270-5. DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2008-0181. View