» Articles » PMID: 20643512

Adaptive Dose Painting by Numbers for Head-and-neck Cancer

Overview
Specialties Oncology
Radiology
Date 2010 Jul 21
PMID 20643512
Citations 61
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the feasibility of adaptive intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) using dose painting by numbers (DPBN) for head-and-neck cancer.

Methods And Materials: Each patient's treatment used three separate treatment plans: fractions 1-10 used a DPBN ([(18)-F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography [(18)F-FDG-PET]) voxel intensity-based IMRT plan based on a pretreatment (18)F-FDG-PET/computed tomography (CT) scan; fractions 11-20 used a DPBN plan based on a (18)F-FDG-PET/CT scan acquired after the eighth fraction; and fractions 21-32 used a conventional (uniform dose) IMRT plan. In a Phase I trial, two dose prescription levels were tested: a median dose of 80.9 Gy to the high-dose clinical target volume (CTV(high_dose)) (dose level I) and a median dose of 85.9 Gy to the gross tumor volume (GTV) (dose level II). Between February 2007 and August 2009, 7 patients at dose level I and 14 patients at dose level II were enrolled.

Results: All patients finished treatment without a break, and no Grade 4 acute toxicity was observed. Treatment adaptation (i.e., plans based on the second (18)F-FDG-PET/CT scan) reduced the volumes for the GTV (41%, p = 0.01), CTV(high_dose) (18%, p = 0.01), high-dose planning target volume (14%, p = 0.02), and parotids (9-12%, p < 0.05). Because the GTV was much smaller than the CTV(high_dose) and target adaptation, further dose escalation at dose level II resulted in less severe toxicity than that observed at dose level I.

Conclusion: To our knowledge, this represents the first clinical study that combines adaptive treatments with dose painting by numbers. Treatment as described above is feasible.

Citing Articles

Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging responses in head and neck cancer patients treated with magnetic resonance-guided hypofractionated radiation therapy.

Bonate R, Awan M, Himburg H, Wong S, Shukla M, Tarima S Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2025; 33:100693.

PMID: 39877149 PMC: 11772986. DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100693.


Is there a role for [F]-FMISO PET to guide dose adaptive radiotherapy in head and neck cancer? A review of the literature.

Sambasivan K, Barrington S, Connor S, Witney T, Blower P, Urbano T Clin Transl Imaging. 2024; 12(2):137-155.

PMID: 39286295 PMC: 7616449. DOI: 10.1007/s40336-023-00607-y.


Treatment Planning Methods for Dose Painting by Numbers Treatment in Gamma Knife Radiosurgery.

Tham B, Aleman D, Nordstrom H, Nygren N, Coolens C Adv Radiat Oncol. 2024; 9(8):101534.

PMID: 39104874 PMC: 11298584. DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2024.101534.


Prediction of radiologic outcome-optimized dose plans and post-treatment magnetic resonance images: A proof-of-concept study in breast cancer brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery.

Pandey S, Kutuk T, Abdalah M, Stringfield O, Ravi H, Mills M Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2024; 31:100602.

PMID: 39040435 PMC: 11261135. DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100602.


Adaptive radiotherapy for head and neck cancer: Pitfalls and possibilities from the radiation oncologist's point of view.

Nuyts S, Bollen H, Eisbruch A, Strojan P, Mendenhall W, Ng S Cancer Med. 2024; 13(8):e7192.

PMID: 38650546 PMC: 11036082. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.7192.