» Articles » PMID: 20642392

Economic Models in Type 2 Diabetes

Overview
Publisher Informa Healthcare
Date 2010 Jul 21
PMID 20642392
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To identify and critically appraise cost-effectiveness models developed to evaluate type 2 diabetes (T2D) treatments and to assess which types of treatment effects they capture.

Research Design And Methods: A systematic search was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination databases at the University of York, and Health Economic Evaluation Database for the period to September 2008. The websites of Health Technology Assessment (HTA) bodies in different countries were also screened for relevant models. For each of the identified original models, details of the structure, data in- and outputs were extracted and the overall quality of the model in terms of the combination of structure, assumptions and data inputs were appraised using published criteria.

Results: Seventy-eight articles and 41 HTAs reporting relevant economic evaluations were identified. There were ten models with multiple publications, and a further ten models with one associated publication. The critical review demonstrated that most had the same fundamental structure, used similar micro-simulation techniques and were based on the same key data sources. However, the process for identification of relevant data and their synthesis, and the selection of outcomes lacked transparency. The models differed according to the extent and type of interventions they evaluated and which diabetes complications and treatment-related adverse events were captured. For example, just one model incorporated changes in patient weight, despite the fact that weight gain can be a side-effect of some treatments, and weight loss a potential benefit of others.

Conclusions: Whilst many economic models exist in T2D, most share common features such as the model type. Identified shortcomings are lack of transparency in data identification and evidence synthesis as well as the selection of the modelled outcomes. Future models should aim to include all relevant treatment outcomes, whether these relate to effects on underlying diabetes and its complications or to short- or long-term side effects of treatment.

Citing Articles

Health state utility values of type 2 diabetes mellitus and related complications: a systematic review and meta-regression.

Wang Y, Xu Y, Shan H, Pan H, Chen J, Yang J Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2024; 22(1):74.

PMID: 39244536 PMC: 11380328. DOI: 10.1186/s12955-024-02288-1.


A Systematic Review of Methodologies Used in Models of the Treatment of Diabetes Mellitus.

Antoniou M, Mateus C, Hollingsworth B, Titman A Pharmacoeconomics. 2023; 42(1):19-40.

PMID: 37737454 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-023-01312-4.


A Systematic Review of Cost-Effectiveness Studies of Newer Non-Insulin Antidiabetic Drugs: Trends in Decision-Analytical Models for Modelling of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

Laursen H, Jorgensen E, Vestergaard P, Ehlers L Pharmacoeconomics. 2023; 41(11):1469-1514.

PMID: 37410277 PMC: 10570198. DOI: 10.1007/s40273-023-01268-5.


Cost-Effectiveness of Semaglutide vs. Empagliflozin, Canagliflozin, and Sitagliptin for Treatment of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in Denmark: A Decision-Analytic Modelling Study.

Pulleyblank R, Larsen N Pharmacoecon Open. 2023; 7(4):579-591.

PMID: 37178435 PMC: 10333151. DOI: 10.1007/s41669-023-00416-z.


Prediction of complications in health economic models of type 2 diabetes: a review of methods used.

Li X, Li F, Wang J, van Giessen A, Feenstra T Acta Diabetol. 2023; 60(7):861-879.

PMID: 36867279 PMC: 10198865. DOI: 10.1007/s00592-023-02045-8.