» Articles » PMID: 20631919

Picasso Paintings, Moon Rocks, and Hand-Written Beatles Lyrics: Adults' Evaluations of Authentic Objects

Overview
Journal J Cogn Cult
Publisher Brill
Date 2010 Jul 16
PMID 20631919
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Authentic objects are those that have an historical link to a person, event, time, or place of some significance (e.g., original Picasso painting; gown worn by Princess Diana; your favorite baby blanket). The current study examines everyday beliefs about authentic objects, with three primary goals: to determine the scope of adults' evaluation of authentic objects, to examine such evaluation in two distinct cultural settings, and to determine whether a person's attachment history (i.e., whether or not they owned an attachment object as a child) predicts evaluation of authentic objects. We found that college students in the U.K. (N = 125) and U.S. (N = 119) consistently evaluate a broad range of authentic items as more valuable than matched control (inauthentic) objects, more desirable to keep, and more desirable to touch, though only non-personal authentic items were judged to be more appropriate for display in a museum. These patterns were remarkably similar across the two cultural contexts. Additionally, those who had an attachment object as a child evaluated objects more favorably, and in particular judged authentic objects to be more valuable. Altogether, these results demonstrate broad endorsement of "positive contagion" among college-educated adults.

Citing Articles

Science museum educators' views on object-based learning: The perceived importance of authenticity and touch.

de Kluis T, Romp S, Land-Zandstra A Public Underst Sci. 2023; 33(3):325-342.

PMID: 37916587 PMC: 10958754. DOI: 10.1177/09636625231202617.


Disambiguating authenticity: Interpretations of value and appeal.

OConnor K, Carroll G, Kovacs B PLoS One. 2017; 12(6):e0179187.

PMID: 28650997 PMC: 5484484. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179187.


Young children's preference for unique owned objects.

Gelman S, Davidson N Cognition. 2016; 155:146-154.

PMID: 27395441 PMC: 4983231. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.06.016.


How much are Harry Potter's glasses worth? Children's monetary evaluation of authentic objects.

Gelman S, Frazier B, Noles N, Manczak E, Stilwell S J Cogn Dev. 2015; 16(1):97-117.

PMID: 25663829 PMC: 4315231. DOI: 10.1080/15248372.2013.815623.


Individualism and the extended-self: cross-cultural differences in the valuation of authentic objects.

Gjersoe N, Newman G, Chituc V, Hood B PLoS One. 2014; 9(3):e90787.

PMID: 24658437 PMC: 3962328. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090787.


References
1.
Passman R . Attachments to inanimate objects: are children who have security blankets insecure?. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1987; 55(6):825-30. DOI: 10.1037//0022-006x.55.6.825. View

2.
Hood B, Bloom P . Children prefer certain individuals over perfect duplicates. Cognition. 2007; 106(1):455-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.01.012. View

3.
Gutheil G, Gelman S, Klein E, Michos K, Kelaita K . Preschoolers' use of spatiotemporal history, appearance, and proper name in determining individual identity. Cognition. 2007; 107(1):366-80. PMC: 2373981. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.07.014. View

4.
Legare C, Gelman S . Bewitchment, biology, or both: the co-existence of natural and supernatural explanatory frameworks across development. Cogn Sci. 2011; 32(4):607-42. DOI: 10.1080/03640210802066766. View

5.
Gelman S, Ebeling K . Shape and representational status in children's early naming. Cognition. 1998; 66(2):B35-B47. DOI: 10.1016/s0010-0277(98)00022-5. View