» Articles » PMID: 20622423

Tobacco Industry Interference for Pictorial Warnings

Overview
Journal Indian J Cancer
Specialty Oncology
Date 2010 Jul 13
PMID 20622423
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: A study was carried out to understand the process of interference by the tobacco industry, to measure the compliance of the industry for displaying pictorial warnings on a tobacco product as per the packaging and labeling rules post 31st May, 2009, and to understand the public opinion on the messages conveyed through such warnings.

Materials And Methods: A total of 60 samples of tobacco products were purchased after 31 May, 2009, from the retail vendors of tobacco sellers across the country.

Results: The government of India has from time to time, taken measures, including legislations, to control tobacco consumption. The actual implementation of these rules has been postponed repeatedly, apparently because of constant pressure exerted by the tobacco industry. The skull and bone sign hurting religious sentiments as stated by the group of ministers proved to be misleading. Later the Group of Ministers (GOM) proposed three very weak and poorly communicative pictorial health warnings to replace those recommended by the Union Health Ministry based on the inputs of the Department of Audio Visual Publicity (DAVP). The industry tried to use strategic means by displaying a dull, diluted, and watered down pictorial warning. The focus group study conducted showed that a scorpion gets associated with the product in a non-scientific manner. X-ray of the lung was hardly understood by anybody.

Conclusion: Overall the tobacco industry has constantly flouted with the law right from the policy level to its implementation by displaying dull, diluted, and poorly informed pictorial warnings.

Citing Articles

Is India on a path to reduce the tobacco industry's influence in tobacco control? Insights from the Global Tobacco Industry Interference Index (2019-2023).

Goel S, Walia D, Bhojani U, Bhatnagar N, Chopra M Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1358834.

PMID: 39371218 PMC: 11450704. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1358834.


Compliance Assessment of Tobacco Products to Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act in India with Reference to Third Amendment Rules, 2020.

Borle A, Deshmukh C, Garg S, Singh M, Singh A, Bhardwaj P Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2023; 24(3):999-1005.

PMID: 36974555 PMC: 10334099. DOI: 10.31557/APJCP.2023.24.3.999.


How do tobacco control policies work in low-income and middle-income countries? A realist synthesis.

Hebbar P, Dsouza V, Bhojani U, Srinivas Prashanth N, van Schayck O, Babu G BMJ Glob Health. 2022; 7(11).

PMID: 36351683 PMC: 9644319. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-008859.


Tobacco Industry Interference Index: Implementation of the World Health Organization's Framework Convention on Tobacco Control Article 5.3 in India.

Chugh A, Bassi S, Nazar G, Bhojani U, Alexander C, Lal P Asia Pac J Public Health. 2020; 32(4):172-178.

PMID: 32396402 PMC: 7612145. DOI: 10.1177/1010539520917793.


Communicating Risk: Assessing Compliance of Tobacco Products to Cigarettes and other Tobacco Products Act (Packaging and Labelling) Amendment Rules 2015 in Delhi, India.

Chahar P, Karnani M, Mohanty V Contemp Clin Dent. 2020; 10(3):417-422.

PMID: 32308313 PMC: 7150564. DOI: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_668_18.