» Articles » PMID: 2060881

Comparative Study of Glass and Antimony Electrodes for Continuous Oesophageal PH Monitoring

Overview
Journal Gut
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 1991 Jun 1
PMID 2060881
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Oesophageal pH monitoring data are influenced by numerous patient or technique related factors, or both. In this study, data recorded with glass microelectrodes or antimony electrodes, both with external cutaneous Ag/AgCl reference electrodes, connected to two different recording devices are compared. Pearson correlation coefficients regarding the reflux index (% of the investigation time with a pH less than 4) ranged from poor to excellent (0.55 to 1.00). Differences in data recorded with glass electrodes are not significantly dependent on the recording device (r:0.93 to 1.00 for the reflux index). The correlation between data simultaneously recorded with antimony electrodes is lower, although not significantly different for the reflux index (0.90). Correlation between data recorded with glass and antimony probes is rather poor (0.55 to 0.70). Therefore data recorded with antimony electrodes cannot be compared with those recorded with glass electrodes. The mean pH recorded with glass electrodes is lower than that with antimony probes.

Citing Articles

Impairment of secondary peristalsis in Barrett's esophagus by transnasal endoscopy-based testing.

Kobayashi G, Kaise M, Arakawa H, Tajiri H World J Gastroenterol. 2014; 20(3):822-8.

PMID: 24574755 PMC: 3921491. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i3.822.


Oesophageal pH monitoring and reflux oesophagitis in irritable infants.

Vandenplas Y, Badriul H, Verghote M, Hauser B, Kaufman L Eur J Pediatr. 2004; 163(6):300-4.

PMID: 15346910 DOI: 10.1007/s00431-004-1403-3.


Post-test calibration of single-use, antimony, 24-hour ambulatory esophageal pH probes is necessary.

Wise J, Kammer P, Murray J Dig Dis Sci. 2004; 49(4):688-92.

PMID: 15185879 DOI: 10.1023/b:ddas.0000026319.79368.b8.

References
1.
Johnson L, DeMeester T . Twenty-four-hour pH monitoring of the distal esophagus. A quantitative measure of gastroesophageal reflux. Am J Gastroenterol. 1974; 62(4):325-32. View

2.
Read N, Fordtran J . The role of intraluminal junction potentials in the generation of the gastric potential difference in man. Gastroenterology. 1979; 76(5 Pt 1):932-8. View

3.
Herbst J, Minton S, Book L . Gastroesophageal reflux causing respiratory distress and apnea in newborn infants. J Pediatr. 1979; 95(5 Pt 1):763-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3476(79)80733-7. View

4.
Ask P, Edwall G, Johansson K, Tibbling L . On the use of monocrystalline antimony pH electrodes in gastro-oesophageal functional disorders. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1982; 20(3):383-9. DOI: 10.1007/BF02442809. View

5.
Menon A, Schefft G, Thach B . Apnea associated with regurgitation in infants. J Pediatr. 1985; 106(4):625-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3476(85)80091-3. View