» Articles » PMID: 20599256

Active Surveillance for Larger (cT1bN0M0 and CT2N0M0) Renal Cortical Neoplasms

Overview
Journal Urology
Specialty Urology
Date 2010 Jul 6
PMID 20599256
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To report our experience with patients undergoing active surveillance (AS) with Stage T1bN0M0 and T2N0M0 tumors. AS is a reasonable option for selected patients with renal cortical neoplasms (RCNs). Most patients undergoing AS are high-risk surgical candidates with Stage T1a lesions. The natural history of larger (Stage cT1bN0M0 and cT2N0M0) RCNs remains undefined.

Methods: Our institution's institutional review board-approved urologic oncology database was reviewed and identified 229 patients undergoing AS for RCNs. Of this cohort, 36 patients with 42 RCNs ≥4 cm were monitored at regular intervals with imaging. Patients with metastatic disease were excluded. The patient demographics, presentation, comorbidity level (Charlson comorbidity index), tumor size, tumor growth rate, and survival data were recorded. A failure of AS was defined as a progression to metastasis or a change from AS to a delayed surgical intervention.

Results: The mean Charlson comorbidity index was 2.83, with 52.8% of patients having an index of ≥3, indicating a high surgical risk. The mean tumor size on the initial computed tomography scan was 7.13 cm (range 4-13.7), and the mean growth rate was 0.57 cm/y (range 0-5.9). With a mean follow-up of 36 months (range 6-96), 5 patients (13.8%) had failure. Three lesions were treated with laparoscopic radical nephrectomy and found to be pT2N0M0 on final pathologic examination. Two patients (5.6%) in this cohort developed metastatic disease, and no cancer-specific deaths occurred.

Conclusions: Patients with Stage T1bN0M0 and T2N0M0 RCNs, monitored for a mean follow-up of 3 years, demonstrated a growth rate of 0.57 cm/y, with only 5.6% of patients progressing to metastatic disease.

Citing Articles

Tracing the evolving dynamics and research hotspots in the kidney neoplasm and nephron sparing surgery field from the past to the new era.

Yao Y, Liu Y, Yang T, Lu B, Yang X, Zhang H Cancer Med. 2024; 13(12):e7336.

PMID: 39651783 PMC: 11192648. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.7336.


Renal tumor growth rate in patients with previously normal CT scan: Analysis of the initial stage of growth.

Ameri C, Pita H, Vitagliano G, Blas L Turk J Urol. 2020; 47(1):9-13.

PMID: 33052828 PMC: 7815238. DOI: 10.5152/tud.2020.20201.


Association of Surgical Delay and Overall Survival in Patients With T2 Renal Masses: Implications for Critical Clinical Decision-making During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Ginsburg K, Curtis G, Patel D, Chen W, Strother M, Kutikov A Urology. 2020; 147:50-56.

PMID: 32966822 PMC: 7502240. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.09.010.


Urologic oncology practice during COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review on what can be deferrable vs. nondeferrable.

Katims A, Razdan S, Eilender B, Wiklund P, Tewari A, Kyprianou N Urol Oncol. 2020; 38(10):783-792.

PMID: 32703636 PMC: 7318929. DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.06.028.


Age Is Important for the Early-Stage Detection of Breast Cancer on Both Transcriptomic and Methylomic Biomarkers.

Feng X, Li J, Li H, Chen H, Li F, Liu Q Front Genet. 2019; 10:212.

PMID: 30984234 PMC: 6448048. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00212.