» Articles » PMID: 2059689

Hormone Replacement Therapy in General Practice: a Survey of Doctors in the MRC's General Practice Research Framework

Overview
Journal BMJ
Specialty General Medicine
Date 1991 Jun 1
PMID 2059689
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To survey current prescribing practice for hormone replacement therapy among general practitioners and to elicit their views on the role of hormone replacement therapy in the prevention of osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease; to determine whether they would participate in randomised controlled trials to evaluate the long term beneficial and adverse effects of hormone replacement therapy.

Design: Postal questionnaires to general practitioners throughout the United Kingdom.

Participants: 1268 general practitioners in the Medical Research Council's general practice research framework.

Results: 1081 (85%) doctors in 220 (95%) practices responded. The doctors were currently prescribing hormone replacement therapy to an estimated 9% of their female patients aged 40 to 64, and 55% of doctors were prescribing opposed hormone replacement therapy (oestrogen plus progestogen) to more patients than a year previously. Over half the doctors would consider prescribing hormone replacement therapy for prevention of osteoporosis (670, 62%) and cardiovascular disease (611, 57%) to asymptomatic women. Overall, 79% of the doctors (851) would definitely or probably consider entering women who have had a hysterectomy into a randomised controlled trial comparing unopposed (oestrogen only) hormone replacement therapy with opposed hormone replacement therapy; 49% (524) would enter patients with a uterus into such a trial. Among a subsample, 85% (180/210) would consider entering patients without menopausal symptoms into a trial comparing hormone replacement therapy with no treatment (unopposed in patients who have had a hysterectomy, opposed in those with a uterus).

Conclusion: There is considerable uncertainty among general practitioners as to the balance of beneficial and harmful effects of hormone replacement therapy in the long term, particularly relating to its use for prevention of osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease. Most of these doctors would be prepared to participate in randomised controlled trials to determine the long term effects of this increasingly widely used treatment.

Citing Articles

The Women's international study of long-duration oestrogen after menopause (WISDOM): a randomised controlled trial.

Vickers M, Martin J, Meade T BMC Womens Health. 2007; 7:2.

PMID: 17324282 PMC: 1828722. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6874-7-2.


Variation in the psychosocial determinants of the intention to prescribe hormone therapy prior to the release of the Women's Health Initiative trial: a survey of general practitioners and gynaecologists in France and Quebec.

Legare F, Godin G, Ringa V, Dodin S, Turcot L, Norton J BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2005; 5:31.

PMID: 16150149 PMC: 1250227. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-5-31.


Benefits and harms associated with hormone replacement therapy: clinical decision analysis.

Minelli C, Abrams K, Sutton A, Cooper N BMJ. 2004; 328(7436):371.

PMID: 14962874 PMC: 341383. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.328.7436.371.


Hormone replacement therapy: the views of general practitioners and practice nurses.

Roberts P, Sibbald B Br J Gen Pract. 2001; 50(461):986, 991.

PMID: 11224973 PMC: 1313888.


Hormone replacement therapy: assessment of present use, costs, and trends.

Townsend J Br J Gen Pract. 1998; 48(427):955-8.

PMID: 9624763 PMC: 1409983.


References
1.
Smith D, Prentice R, Thompson D, HERRMANN W . Association of exogenous estrogen and endometrial carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 1975; 293(23):1164-7. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM197512042932302. View

2.
Draper J, Roland M . Perimenopausal women's views on taking hormone replacement therapy to prevent osteoporosis. BMJ. 1990; 300(6727):786-8. PMC: 1662524. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.300.6727.786. View

3.
Vandenbroucke J . Postmenopausal oestrogen and cardioprotection. Lancet. 1991; 337(8745):833-4. DOI: 10.1016/0140-6736(91)92526-8. View