» Articles » PMID: 20595224

Do Group Audiologic Rehabilitation Activities Influence Psychosocial Outcomes?

Overview
Journal Am J Audiol
Date 2010 Jul 3
PMID 20595224
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To attempt to determine whether group audiologic rehabilitation (AR) content affected psychosocial outcomes.

Method: A randomized controlled trial with at least 17 participants per group was completed. The 3 treatment groups included a communication strategies training group, a communication strategies training plus psychosocial exercise group, and an informational lecture plus psychosocial exercise group. Evaluations were conducted preclass, postclass, and 6-months postclass; they included hearing loss-related and generic quality of life scales, and a class evaluation form.

Results: All treatment groups demonstrated short- and long-term improvement on the hearing loss-related quality of life scale. Minimal differences were measured across treatment groups. A significant difference was observed between the lecture plus psychosocial exercise group and the communication strategies training group for 1 hearing loss-related quality of life subscale. Better outcomes were measured for the 2 groups with psychosocial exercises versus the communication strategies training group on 1 generic quality of life subscale. The results for the class evaluation did not discriminate among the treatment groups.

Conclusions: Class content had only a minimal influence on treatment outcomes. Recommended AR class content includes a mix of interventions including information, training, and psychosocial exercises.

Citing Articles

Effectiveness of the active communication education program in improving the general quality of life of older adults who use hearing aids: a randomized clinical trial.

Marcotti A, Rivera S, Silva-Letelier C, Galaz-Mella J, Fuentes-Lopez E BMC Geriatr. 2024; 24(1):828.

PMID: 39395936 PMC: 11470628. DOI: 10.1186/s12877-024-05424-0.


Effectiveness of a Web-Based SUpport PRogram (SUPR) for Hearing Aid Users Aged 50+: Two-Arm, Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.

Meijerink J, Pronk M, Lissenberg-Witte B, Jansen V, Kramer S J Med Internet Res. 2020; 22(9):e17927.

PMID: 32960175 PMC: 7539169. DOI: 10.2196/17927.


Qualitative research methods to investigate communication within a group aural rehabilitation intervention.

Coco L, Ingram M, Marrone N Int J Audiol. 2019; 58(10):651-660.

PMID: 31329481 PMC: 6917821. DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2019.1608377.


Walk, Talk and Listen: a pilot randomised controlled trial targeting functional fitness and loneliness in older adults with hearing loss.

Jones C, Siever J, Knuff K, Van Bergen C, Mick P, Little J BMJ Open. 2019; 9(4):e026169.

PMID: 30987987 PMC: 6500300. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026169.


The Chronic Care Model and Chronic Condition Self-Management: An Introduction for Audiologists.

Convery E, Hickson L, Keidser G, Meyer C Semin Hear. 2019; 40(1):7-25.

PMID: 30728646 PMC: 6363546. DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1676780.


References
1.
Cox R, Alexander G, Gray G . Personality, hearing problems, and amplification characteristics: contributions to self-report hearing aid outcomes. Ear Hear. 2007; 28(2):141-62. DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31803126a4. View

2.
Preminger J . Should significant others be encouraged to join adult group audiologic rehabilitation classes?. J Am Acad Audiol. 2004; 14(10):545-55. DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.14.10.3. View

3.
Hickson L, Worrall L, Scarinci N . A randomized controlled trial evaluating the active communication education program for older people with hearing impairment. Ear Hear. 2007; 28(2):212-30. DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31803126c8. View

4.
GIOLAS T, Owens E, Lamb S, SCHUBERT E . Hearing performance inventory. J Speech Hear Disord. 1979; 44(2):169-95. DOI: 10.1044/jshd.4402.169. View

5.
Newman C, Weinstein B, Jacobson G, Hug G . Test-retest reliability of the hearing handicap inventory for adults. Ear Hear. 1991; 12(5):355-7. DOI: 10.1097/00003446-199110000-00009. View