» Articles » PMID: 20592694

Junctioning Longitudinally Adjacent PTVs with Helical TomoTherapy

Overview
Date 2010 Jul 2
PMID 20592694
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Irradiation of longitudinally adjacent PTVs with Helical TomoTherapy (HT) may be clinically necessary, for example in treating a recurrent PTV adjacent to a previously-treated volume. In this work, the parameters which influence the cumulative dose distribution resulting from treating longitudinally adjacent PTVs are examined, including field width, pitch, and PTV location. In-phantom dose distributions were calculated for various on- and off-axis cylindrical PTVs and were verified by ion chamber and film measurement. Dose distributions were calculated to cover 95% of the PTV by the prescribed dose (DP) using 25 and 50 mm long HT fields with pitches of either 0.3 or 0.45. These dose distributions where then used to calculate the 3D dose distribution in the junction region between two PTVs. The best junction uniformity was obtained for fields of equal width, with larger fields providing better intra-PTV dose homogeneity than smaller fields. Junctioning fields of different widths resulted in a much larger dose inhomogeneity, but this could be improved significantly by dividing the junction end of the PTV treated with the smaller field into multiple (up to 4) sub-PTVs, with the prescribed dose in each sub-PTV decreasing with proximity to the junction region. This provided a PTV matching with dose homogeneity similar to that achieved when junctioning two PTVs, both irradiated by the 50 mm field, and provided a distribution where 95% of the PTV received at least the prescribed dose, with maximum excursions from prescribed dose varying from -19% to +13%. We conclude that junctioning adjacent PTVs is possible. Treating longitudinally adjacent PTVs with different widths is a challenge, but dose uniformity is improved by breaking PTVs into multiple contiguous sub-PTVs modified to feather (broaden) the effective junctioning region.

Citing Articles

Feasibility of hybrid TomoHelical- and TomoDirect-based volumetric gradient matching technique for total body irradiation.

Hong C, Kim M, Kim J, Chang K, Park K, Kim D Radiat Oncol. 2019; 14(1):233.

PMID: 31856870 PMC: 6924057. DOI: 10.1186/s13014-019-1435-5.


MLC-based penumbra softener of EDW borders to reduce junction inhomogeneities.

Szpala S, Kohli K J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2017; 18(3):118-129.

PMID: 28422401 PMC: 5689845. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12082.

References
1.
Bauman G, Yartsev S, Fisher B, Kron T, Laperriere N, Heydarian M . Simultaneous infield boost with helical tomotherapy for patients with 1 to 3 brain metastases. Am J Clin Oncol. 2007; 30(1):38-44. DOI: 10.1097/01.coc.0000245473.41035.c4. View

2.
Rodrigues G, Yartsev S, Chen J, Wong E, DSouza D, Lock M . A comparison of prostate IMRT and helical tomotherapy class solutions. Radiother Oncol. 2006; 80(3):374-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2006.07.005. View

3.
Yoon M, Park S, Shin D, Lee S, Pyo H, Kim D . A new homogeneity index based on statistical analysis of the dose-volume histogram. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2007; 8(2):9-17. PMC: 5722417. DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v8i2.2390. View

4.
Kissick M, Flynn R, Westerly D, Rockwell Mackie T, Hoban P . On the making of sharp longitudinal dose profiles with helical tomotherapy. Phys Med Biol. 2007; 52(21):6497-510. PMC: 2220158. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/52/21/011. View

5.
Hui S, Verneris M, Higgins P, Gerbi B, Weigel B, Baker S . Helical tomotherapy targeting total bone marrow - first clinical experience at the University of Minnesota. Acta Oncol. 2007; 46(2):250-5. DOI: 10.1080/02841860601042449. View