» Articles » PMID: 2059148

Gender Differences in Memory for a Sexual Story

Overview
Journal Arch Sex Behav
Date 1991 Jun 1
PMID 2059148
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The present research extended previous work that identified gender differences in memory for a sexual text. That work identified a memory bias for the sexes in recognition memory, whereas we found gender differences in errors in recall memory. Recall memory is particularly important because it provides the opportunity for the individual to construct memory. This provides the opportunity for distortion to occur and allows the individual to make errors. The prediction that men would incorrectly recall more material of an erotic nature was supported. The prediction that women would incorrectly recall material that was romantic in nature was not confirmed. In a recognition task both genders endorsed more false positives of a sexual nature than a romantic nature. Using findings from research on memory for written text, predictions concerning the effects of importance, perspective, and typicality were made. Those predictions were not confirmed. A discussion of possible explanations for the various findings is presented.

Citing Articles

Effect of Relationship Status on Response Times to Sexual and Romantic Stimuli Among Japanese Undergraduates in a Memory Task.

Kato T Arch Sex Behav. 2021; 51(1):601-610.

PMID: 34671874 DOI: 10.1007/s10508-021-02149-8.


Memory for child sexual abuse information: simulated memory error and individual differences.

McWilliams K, Goodman G, Lyons K, Newton J, Avila-Mora E Mem Cognit. 2013; 42(1):151-63.

PMID: 23835600 DOI: 10.3758/s13421-013-0345-2.


Sex differences in memory for sexually-relevant information.

McCall K, Rellini A, Seal B, Meston C Arch Sex Behav. 2006; 36(4):508-17.

PMID: 17186127 PMC: 2863029. DOI: 10.1007/s10508-006-9106-7.


Sexual content induced delays in unprimed lexical decisions: gender and context effects.

Geer J, Bellard H Arch Sex Behav. 1996; 25(4):379-95.

PMID: 8836471 DOI: 10.1007/BF02437581.

References
1.
Bentler P . Heterosexual behavior assessment. II. Females. Behav Res Ther. 1968; 6(1):27-30. DOI: 10.1016/0005-7967(68)90038-7. View

2.
Heiman J . A psychophysiological exploration of sexual arousal patterns in females and males. Psychophysiology. 1977; 14(3):266-74. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1977.tb01173.x. View

3.
Schmidt G, Sigusch V, Schafer S . Responses to reading erotic stories: male-female differences. Arch Sex Behav. 1973; 2(3):181-99. DOI: 10.1007/BF01541755. View

4.
Julien E, OVER R . Male sexual arousal across five modes of erotic stimulation. Arch Sex Behav. 1988; 17(2):131-43. DOI: 10.1007/BF01542663. View

5.
Bentler P . Heterosexual behavior assessment. I. Males. Behav Res Ther. 1968; 6(1):21-5. DOI: 10.1016/0005-7967(68)90037-5. View