» Articles » PMID: 20587676

Antenatal Consent in the SUPPORT Trial: Challenges, Costs, and Representative Enrollment

Overview
Journal Pediatrics
Specialty Pediatrics
Date 2010 Jul 1
PMID 20587676
Citations 34
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: The purposes of this study were to quantify the time and effort involved in obtaining prenatal consent for the Neonatal Research Network Surfactant Positive Airway Pressure and Pulse Oximetry Randomized Trial (SUPPORT) and to determine whether the enrolled infants were representative of the eligible population.

Methods: Eligible subjects were likely to deliver in the SUPPORT gestational age window (24-27(6/7)] weeks). Data included who approached the subjects for consent, how often they approached, the duration of each contact, whether consent was obtained, and whether subjects were enrolled in the trial. Eligible, nonenrolled infants entered into the Neonatal Research Network Generic Database throughout the period of SUPPORT enrollment were compared with enrolled infants.

Results: A total of 2826 women were identified at 18 sites, 2228 were approached for consent, and 1219 (54.7%) agreed. For 76.9% of those approached, <3 visits (mean: 2.0 +/- 1.2 visits) were required to complete the consent process. Of the 659 infants with consent who were delivered within the study window, 611 were enrolled. Mothers who received a neonatal consultation were more likely to give consent (P < .001). The proportion of infants not exposed to steroids was significantly greater in the nonapproached group than in the approached group (20.0% vs 3.4%; P < .0001).

Conclusion: In a trial that involved preterm infants and required prenatal consent, >5 women were identified as being likely to deliver in the SUPPORT gestational age window for each 1 who delivered an enrolled infant.

Citing Articles

Piloting the better research interactions for every family (BRIEF) researcher intervention to support recruitment for a neonatal clinical trial: parent experience and infant enrollment.

Weiss E, Duenas D, Kelsh A, Gray M, Oslin E, Mcneil D J Perinatol. 2025; .

PMID: 40038540 DOI: 10.1038/s41372-025-02245-w.


Early exclusive enteral feeding in 30-33 weeks gestation infants: a randomized controlled trial.

Alshaikh B, Hassan O, Alburaki W, Dharel D, Elsharkawy A, Singal N J Perinatol. 2025; .

PMID: 39894877 DOI: 10.1038/s41372-025-02217-0.


Eligible Infants Included in Neonatal Clinical Trials and Reasons for Noninclusion: A Systematic Review.

Shaikh H, Lyle A, Oslin E, Gray M, Weiss E JAMA Netw Open. 2024; 7(10):e2441372.

PMID: 39453652 PMC: 11581680. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.41372.


Development of the Better Research Interactions for Every Family (BRIEF) intervention to support recruitment for neonatal clinical trials: an intervention mapping guided approach.

Weiss E, Gray M, Ko L, Duenas D, Oslin E, Kraft S Trials. 2024; 25(1):610.

PMID: 39267164 PMC: 11395641. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-08446-6.


Motivations for and against Participation in Neonatal Research: Insights from Interviews of Diverse Parents Approached for Neonatal Research in the United States.

Weiss E, Donohue P, Wootton S, Stevens E, Merhar S, Puia-Dumitrescu M J Pediatr. 2024; 275:113923.

PMID: 38492913 PMC: 11399325. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2024.113923.


References
1.
Moher D, Schulz K, Altman D . The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. JAMA. 2001; 285(15):1987-91. DOI: 10.1001/jama.285.15.1987. View

2.
Constantine W, Haynes C, Spiker D, Constantine N . Recruitment and retention in a clinical trial for low birth weight, premature infants. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 1993; 14(1):1-7. View

3.
SILVERMAN W . The myth of informed consent: in daily practice and in clinical trials. J Med Ethics. 1989; 15(1):6-11. PMC: 1375753. DOI: 10.1136/jme.15.1.6. View

4.
Mitchell A, Kline J . Systematic bias introduced by the informed consent process in a diagnostic research study. Acad Emerg Med. 2008; 15(3):225-30. DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00066.x. View

5.
Harth S, Thong Y . Sociodemographic and motivational characteristics of parents who volunteer their children for clinical research: a controlled study. BMJ. 1990; 300(6736):1372-5. PMC: 1662959. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.300.6736.1372. View