» Articles » PMID: 20587614

Prognosis of Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia is Affected by the Type of the Preceding Hematologic Disorders and the Presence of Trisomy 8

Overview
Specialty Oncology
Date 2010 Jul 1
PMID 20587614
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Differences in the clinical course of secondary acute myeloid leukemia according to the type of the preceding disorders are not defined. We compared the outcomes of therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia, acute myeloid leukemia following myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloiod leukemia following myeloproliferative neoplasm. We also intended to find prognostic factors in secondary acute myeloid leukemia overall.

Methods: Retrospective medical record review at Seoul National University Hospital was performed. We assessed response to induction chemotherapy and overall survival.

Results: Ninety-five secondary acute myeloid leukemia patients (median age of 56.4 years) were analyzed. Twenty-six, 57 and 12 patients had therapy-related leukemia, leukemia following myelodysplastic syndrome and myeloproliferative neoplasm, respectively. For patients receiving induction chemotherapy, complete remission rate was 47.5% and complete remission rate was different according to the type of the preceding disorders (P = 0.004). Compared to therapy-related leukemia (P = 0.027) and leukemia following myelodysplastic syndrome (P = 0.050), leukemia following myeloproliferative neoplasm had shorter overall survival. In secondary leukemia, presence of trisomy 8 had a prognostic impact (P = 0.003) along with cytogenetic risk group (P = 0.016). In multivariate analysis, the type of the preceding disorders (P = 0.026), 5q deletion (P = 0.015) and trisomy 8 (P = 0.040) were independent prognostic factors.

Conclusions: Prognosis of secondary acute myeloid leukemia was different according to the type of the preceding disorders with the worst prognosis in leukemia following myeloprolfierative neoplasm. Along with cytogenetic risk grouping, trisomy 8 had a poor prognostic impact in secondary acute myeloid leukemia.

Citing Articles

A real-world analysis of clinical outcomes in AML with myelodysplasia-related changes: a comparison of ICC and WHO-HAEM5 criteria.

Zhou Q, Zhao D, Zarif M, Davidson M, Minden M, Tierens A Blood Adv. 2024; 8(7):1760-1771.

PMID: 38286462 PMC: 10985805. DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023011869.


Dual inhibition of EZH2 and G9A/GLP histone methyltransferases by HKMTI-1-005 promotes differentiation of acute myeloid leukemia cells.

Sbirkov Y, Schenk T, Kwok C, Stengel S, Brown R, Brown G Front Cell Dev Biol. 2023; 11:1076458.

PMID: 37035245 PMC: 10076884. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2023.1076458.


Chromosomal Instability in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Lisboa M, Brofman P, Schmid-Braz A, Rangel-Pozzo A, Mai S Cancers (Basel). 2021; 13(11).

PMID: 34071283 PMC: 8198625. DOI: 10.3390/cancers13112655.


ELN risk stratification and outcomes in secondary and therapy-related AML patients consolidated with allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

Jentzsch M, Grimm J, Bill M, Brauer D, Backhaus D, Goldmann K Bone Marrow Transplant. 2020; 56(4):936-945.

PMID: 33208914 PMC: 8035074. DOI: 10.1038/s41409-020-01129-1.


Leukemia secondary to myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Dunbar A, Rampal R, Levine R Blood. 2020; 136(1):61-70.

PMID: 32430500 PMC: 7332899. DOI: 10.1182/blood.2019000943.